David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The paper develops models of statistical experiments that combine propensities with frequencies, the underlying theory being the branching space-times (BST) of Belnap (1992). The models are then applied to analyze Bell's theorem. We prove the so-called Bell-CH inequality via the assumptions of a BST version of Outcome Independence and of (non-probabilistic) No Conspiracy. Notably, neither the condition of probabilistic No Conspiracy nor the condition of Parameter Independence is needed in the proof. As the Bell-CH inequality is most likely experimentally falsified, the choice is this: contrary to the appearances, experimenters cannot choose some measurement settings, or some transitions, with spacelike related initial events, are correlated; or both.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Federico Laudisa (2008). Non-Local Realistic Theories and the Scope of the Bell Theorem. Foundations of Physics 38 (12):1110-1132.
Geoffrey Hellman (1982). Stochastic Locality and the Bell Theorems. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:601 - 615.
W. Michael Dickson (1996). Determinism and Locality in Quantum Systems. Synthese 107 (1):55 - 82.
Tim Maudlin (1992). Bell's Inequality, Information Transmission, and Prism Models. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:404 - 417.
Thomas Müller & Tomasz Placek (2001). Against a Minimalist Reading of Bell's Theorem: Lessons From Fine. Synthese 128 (3):343 - 379.
T. Kowalski & Tomasz Placek (1999). Outcomes in Branching Space-Time and GHZ-Bell Theorems. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (3):349-375.
Geoffrey Hellman (1982). Stochastic Einstein-Locality and the Bell Theorems. Synthese 53 (3):461 - 504.
Tomasz Placek (2000). Stochastic Outcomes in Branching Space-Time: Analysis of Bell's Theorem. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):445-475.
Jeremy Butterfield (1992). Bell's Theorem: What It Takes. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (1):41-83.
Added to index2009-10-01
Total downloads29 ( #58,910 of 1,098,610 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #18,743 of 1,098,610 )
How can I increase my downloads?