David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Religious Studies 37 (2):215-222 (2001)
First, my thanks to Richard Swinburne for his probing and thoughtful review of my book Warranted Christian Belief (WCB). His account of the book's mainline of argument is accurate as far as it goes; it does contain an important lacuna, however. The focus of the book is twofold; it is aimed in two directions. First, just as Swinburne says, I argue that there are no plausible de iure objections to Christian belief that are independent of de facto objections; any plausible objection to the rationality of Christian belief, or to its warrant (the property that distinguishes knowledge from mere true belief), or its justification, will either be obviously mistaken or will (as with Freud, and Marx and a thousand others) presuppose one or more de facto objections. This is intended as a contribution to apologetics; it is important, because many or most objections to Christian belief are of just the sort I attempt to discredit. (‘I don't know whether Christian belief is true or not – who could know a thing like that? – but I do know that it is irrational, or unwarranted, or not rationally justified, or…’.) Second (and this is the focus Swinburne fails to mention), I proposed the extended A/C (Aquinas/Calvin) model as, from the perspective of Christian belief, a plausible account of the way in which Christian belief is, in fact, justified, rational and warranted. So the book is aimed in two directions: first towards readers generally, whether Christian believers or not, and second towards Christian believers.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Gregory W. Dawes (2011). In Defense of Naturalism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (1):3-25.
Kevin S. Diller (2011). Can Arguments Boost Warrant for Christian Belief? Warrant Boosting and the Primacy of Divine Revelation. Religious Studies 47 (2):185-200.
Similar books and articles
Yiftach J. H. Fehige (2010). The "Art of Dialogue" and the Christian-Jewish Encounter. A First Approach. Jahrbuch für Religionsphilosophie 9:67-93.
Alvin Plantinga (2001). Swinburne and Plantinga on Internal Rationality. Religious Studies 37 (3):357-358.
Michael W. Austin (2005). Moral Difficulties in Plantinga's Model of Warranted Christian Belief. Philosophy and Theology 17 (1-2):121-132.
Richard M. Gale (2001). Alvin Plantinga's Warranted Christian Belief. Philo 4 (2):138-147.
Pierre Le Morvan (2003). Notes and Comments. Heythrop Journal 44 (3):345-351.
P. Forrest (2002). Warranted Christian Belief. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (1):109 – 111.
Richard Swinburne (2001). Plantinga on Warrant. Religious Studies 37 (2):203-214.
Tyler Wunder (2002). Warranted Christian Belief by Alvin Plantinga. Philo 5 (1):103-118.
Richard Swinburne (2001). Swinburne and Plantinga on Internal Rationality. Religious Studies 37 (3):357-358.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads66 ( #21,992 of 1,101,125 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #115,950 of 1,101,125 )
How can I increase my downloads?