David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy in the Contemporary World 7 (1):27-34 (2000)
In the following paper I shall outline a number of preliminary ideas concerning the relationship between the Holocaust and certain themes which emerge in the work of Emmanuel Levinas. As this relationship is distinctly twofold, my analysis will include both a textual and a rather more speculative component. That is to say, while I shall argue that reading Levinas specifically as a post-Holocaust thinker clarifies a number of his philosophical and rhetorical motifs, so, in turn, does this challenging body of work offer a means by which to re-think both the horror and ethical significance of the Holocaust itself. During the course of my argument I shall additionally refer to the writings of Primo Levi, Jacques Derrida and Martin Heidegger through whom I hope also to establish the central role guilt and confession play in Levinas’s own thinking
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Joshua Shaw (2011). Is Levinass Philosophy a Response to the Holocaust? Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 18 (2):121-146.
Bob Plant (2003). Doing Justice to the Derrida–Levinas Connection: A Response to Mark Dooley. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (4):427-450.
Drew M. Dalton (2009). Otherwise Than Nothing. Philosophy and Theology 21 (1/2):105-128.
Bob Plant (2006). Apologies: Levinas and Dialogue. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (1):79 – 94.
Lawrence Burns (2008). Identifying Concrete Ethical Demands in the Face of the Abstract Other: Emmanuel Levinas' Pragmatic Ethics. Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (3):315-335.
Adriaan Theodoor Peperzak (ed.) (1995). Ethics as First Philosophy: The Significance of Emmanuel Levinas for Philosophy, Literature, and Religion. Routledge.
Hagi Kenaan (2011). Facing Images. Angelaki 16 (1):143 - 159.
Thomas L. Gwozdz (2010). Metaphysics and Ethics. International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (4):489-500.
Nader El-Bizri (2006). Uneasy Interrogations Following Levinas. Studia Phaenomenologica 6:293-315.
A. T. Nuyen (2001). The "Ethical Anthropic Principle" and the Religious Ethics of Levinas. Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (3):427 - 442.
Lawrence Vogel (2008). Emmanuel Levinas and the Judaism of the Good Samaritan. Levinas Studies 3:193-208.
Simon Lumsden (2000). Absolute Difference and Social Ontology: Levinas Face to Face with Buber and Fichte. [REVIEW] Human Studies 23 (3):227-241.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads5 ( #230,090 of 1,102,989 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,832 of 1,102,989 )
How can I increase my downloads?