Skinner's distinction between rule-governed and contingency-shaped behaviour
Philosophical Psychology 1 (2):225 – 234 (1988)
| Abstract | The distinction that Skinner draws in his 'An operant analysis of problem solving' (1966, 1969, 1984) between 'rule-governed' and 'contingency-shaped' behaviour is arguably the most important single contribution to the theory of behaviour that he has made in a long and uniquely distinguished career. The concept of a 'rule' as a 'contingency-specifying' verbal formula which exercises 'stimulus control' over other aspects of the behaviour of a linguistically competent human being presents a formidable challenge to contemporary cognitive psychology in that the Representation' and 'computation' of environmental contingencies is seen as confined to verbally controlled behaviour emitted by linguistically competent human subjects. It also suggests a way of filling a major gap in the account of language offered by Skinner in his earlier book Verbal Behaviour (1957), namely the lack of any account of how the speaker is able to use instructions to evoke behaviour which the listener never previously emitted and declarative sentences to convey information about contingencies which the listener has never previously encountered. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesF. Woollard (2011). Most Ways I Could Move: Bennett's Act/Omission Distinction and the Behaviour Space. Mind 120 (477):155-182.
Ullin T. Place (1997). Linguistic Behaviorism and the Correspondence Theory of Truth. Behavior and Philosophy 25 (2):83 - 94.
Roy A. Moxley (2001). The Modern/Postmodern Context of Skinner's Selectionist Turn in 1945. Behavior and Philosophy 29:121 - 153.
Anne Ruth Mackor (1998). Rules Are Laws: An Argument Against Holism. Philosophical Explorations 1 (3):215 – 232.
Roy A. Moxley (1997). Skinner: From Essentialist to Selectionist Meaning. Behavior and Philosophy 25 (2):95 - 119.
David Cheal (1980). Rule-Governed Behaviour. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 10 (1):39-49.
D. Vuysje (1956). "Verification" of Statements in Psychology. Synthese 10 (1):369-372.
Hugh M. Lacey (1974). The Scientific Study of Lingustic Behaviour: A Perspective on the Skinner-Chomsky Controversy. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 4 (1):17–51.
Roy A. Moxley (1996). The Import of Skinner's Three-Term Contingency. Behavior and Philosophy 24 (2):145 - 167.
Emilio Ribes-Iñesta (2000). Instructions, Rules, and Abstraction: A Misconstrued Relation. Behavior and Philosophy 28 (1/2):41 - 55.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-03-08Total downloads13 ( #88,037 of 550,917 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 550,917 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
