OUP Oxford (2009)
|Abstract||The aim of the book is two-fold. First of all it is to provide a fair, complete and analytical account of the Neo-liberal conception of the role and function of the state in modern society. The second aim is to provide a critical assessment of some of the central elements of this conception. The book will look at the emphasis of Neo-liberals on procedural and rule governed approaches to the role of the state rather than outcome or end state views of the role of government and to consider how this conception of politics relates to issues such as the rule of law, freedom, justice, rights, the relationship to the market economy, to civil society and to look at the role of government in relation to the provision of welfare and public sector services more generally. It builds up the Neo-liberal case in respect of these aspects of modern society by drawing upon the works of central Neo-liberal thinkers such as Hayek, Mises, Menger, as well as thinkers such as Oakeshott, Nozick and Rotbard who are not directly Neo-liberals but whose works have been important for the development of central Neo-liberal themes. The second part of the book provides what might be regarded as an immanent critique of the Neo-liberal case built up in the first part of the study. It takes Neo-liberal ideas very seriously and shows how incoherences arise within and between those ideas such that a plausible form of Neo-liberalism as opposed to Libertarianism on the one hand and Social Democracy on the other is very difficult to state. The theme of this book is very germane given the considerable debate which is now taking place in the context of the world financial crisis about the appropriate role for the state.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Buy the book||$30.17 used (69% off) $34.73 new (64% off) $82.78 direct from Amazon (13% off) Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Raymond Plant (2011). The Jurisprudence Annual Lecture 2010 Freedom, Coercion, Necessary Goods and the Rule of Law. Jurisprudence 2 (1):1-16.
Andrew Barry, Thomas Osborne & Nikolas S. Rose (eds.) (1996). Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism, and Rationalities of Government. University of Chicago Press.
Bernard D'Mello (2002). Transnational Pharmaceutical Corporations and Neo-Liberal Business Ethics in India. Journal of Business Ethics 36 (1-2):165 - 185.
Barry Hindess (2000). Democracy and the Neo‐Liberal Promotion of Arbitrary Power. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (4):68-84.
Robert Hassan (2008). Network Speed and Democratic Politics. World Futures 64 (1):3 – 21.
Menachem Mautner, From 'Honor' to 'Dignity': How Should a Liberal State Treat Non-Liberal Cultural Groups?
Symphorien Ntibagirirwa (2009). Cultural Values, Economic Growth and Development. Journal of Business Ethics 84:297 - 311.
Ben Spiecker & Jan Steutel (1995). Political Liberalism, Civic Education and the Dutch Government. Journal of Moral Education 24 (4):383-394.
Uri Ram (2000). National, Ethnic or Civic? Contesting Paradigms of Memory, Identity and Culture in Israel. Studies in Philosophy and Education 19 (5/6):405-422.
Robert G. Dyck (2004). The End of Neo-Liberalism and the Beginnings of Integral Economics. World Futures 60 (4):311 – 317.
Matthew J. Webb (2006). Is There a Liberal Right to Secede From a Liberal State? TRAMES 10 (4):371-386.
Leszek Kolakowski (1993). On the Practicability of Liberalism: What About the Children? Critical Review 7 (1):1-13.
Charles Larmore (2003). Liberal and Republican Conceptions of Freedom. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):96-119.
Added to index2012-01-31
Total downloads2 ( #232,628 of 549,196 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,196 )
How can I increase my downloads?