Warrant: The Current Debate

Oxford University Press (1993)
Plantinga examines the nature of epistemic warrant; whatever it is that when added to true belief yields knowledge. This volume surveys current contributions to the debate and paves the way for his owm positive proposal in Warrant and Proper Function.
Keywords Knowledge, Theory of  Belief and doubt
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book $27.78 used (59% off)   $31.06 new (54% off)   $46.91 direct from Amazon (26% off)    Amazon page
Call number BD161.P58 1993
ISBN(s) 0195078624   9780195078626  
DOI 10.2307/2186022
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
James Pryor (2004). What's Wrong with Moore's Argument? Philosophical Issues 14 (1):349–378.
James Pryor (2004). What's Wrong with Moore's Argument? Philosophical Issues 14 (1):349-378.

View all 117 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

53 ( #64,560 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #99,332 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.