David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (2011)
This book is a long-awaited major statement by a pre-eminent analytic philosopher, Alvin Plantinga, on one of our biggest debates -- the compatibility of science and religion. The last twenty years has seen a cottage industry of books on this divide, but with little consensus emerging. Plantinga, as a top philosopher but also a proponent of the rationality of religious belief, has a unique contribution to make. His theme in this short book is that the conflict between science and theistic religion is actually superficial, and that at a deeper level they are in concord. Plantinga examines where this conflict is supposed to exist -- evolution, evolutionary psychology, analysis of scripture, scientific study of religion -- as well as claims by Dan Dennett, Richard Dawkins, and Philip Kitcher that evolution and theistic belief cannot co-exist. Plantinga makes a case that their arguments are not only inconclusive but that the supposed conflicts themselves are superficial, due to the methodological naturalism used by science. On the other hand, science can actually offer support to theistic doctrines, and Plantinga uses the notion of biological and cosmological "fine-tuning" in support of this idea. Plantinga argues that we might think about arguments in science and religion in a new way -- as different forms of discourse that try to persuade people to look at questions from a perspective such that they can see that something is true. In this way, there is a deep and massive consonance between theism and the scientific enterprise.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$12.27 used (57% off) $21.97 new (22% off) $22.51 direct from Amazon (20% off) Amazon page|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
John Schneider (2012). The Fall of “Augustinian Adam”: Original Fragility and Supralapsarian Purpose. Zygon 47 (4):949-969.
Tristan Casabianca (2013). The Shroud of Turin: A Historiographical Approach. Heythrop Journal 54 (3):414-423.
Yiftach Fehige (2013). Sexual Diversity and Divine Creation: A Tightrope Walk Between Christianity and Science. Zygon 48 (1):35-59.
Erkki Vesa Rope Kojonen (2013). Tensions in Intelligent Design's Critique of Theistic Evolutionism. Zygon 48 (2):251-273.
Tyler Andrew Wunder (2013). Alvin Plantinga on Paul Draper's Evolutionary Atheology: Implications of Theism's Noncontingency. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):67-75.
Similar books and articles
Alvin Plantinga (2010). Science and Religion: Are They Compatible? Oxford University press.
S. Muhammad-Taqīy Mudarrisī (2011). Augustinian Science: Alvin Plantinga’s Idea on Philosophizing and Scientific Theorizing Based on Religious Belief. Dissertation, Mofid University
S. Muhammad-Taqīy Mudarrisī (2011). Methodology of Augustinian Science. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities (69):7-39.
Richard Jonathan Sagar, The Cognitive Science of Religion/Atheism and its Impact on Plantinga's Reformed Epistemology.
Bradley Monton & Logan Paul Gage (2012). Alvin Plantinga: Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 72 (1):53-57.
Ulrich Schmidt (2012). Alvin Plantinga, Where the Conflict Really Lies. Science, Religion, and Naturalism. Metaphysica 13 (2):229-236.
Jim Slagle (2013). Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism by Alvin Plantinga. Zygon 48 (1):234-236.
Geoff Childers (2011). What's Wrong with the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism? International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (3):193-204.
Piotr Bylica & Dariusz Sagan (2008). God, Design, and Naturalism: Implications of Methodological Naturalism in Science for Science–Religion Relation. Pensamiento 64:621-38.
Deane-Peter Baker (ed.) (2007). Alvin Plantinga. Cambridge University Press.
James K. Beilby (ed.) (2002). Naturalism Defeated?: Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. Cornell University Press.
Tyler Wunder (2002). Warranted Christian Belief by Alvin Plantinga. Philo 5 (1):103-118.
Added to index2012-04-15
Total downloads42 ( #38,445 of 1,096,743 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #53,739 of 1,096,743 )
How can I increase my downloads?