Journal of Philosophical Research 20:19-43 (1995)
|Abstract||Two kinds of critical questions have been asked about the propriety or rightness of Christian beliefs. The first is the de facto question: is Christian belief true? The second is the de jure question: is it rational, or reasonable, or intellectually acceptable, or rationally justifiable? This second question is much harder to locate than you’d guess from looking at the literature. In “Perceiving God” William AIston suggests that the (or a) right question here is the question of “the practical rationality,” construed as he construes it. I argue that the question is ambiguous: and one of the disambiguees is too easy to answer, while the other is such that its answer is really irrelevant to any sensible version of the de jure question. I conclude by venturing a suggestion as to what a sensible de jure question might be|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Bergmann (2009). Rational Disagreement After Full Disclosure. Episteme 6 (3):336-353.
Jonathan Schaffer (2007). Knowing the Answer. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):383–403.
Jonathan Schaffer (2007). Knowing the Answer. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):383-403.
Marcel J. Boumans, The Difference Between Answering a 'Why' - Question and Answering a 'How Much' - Question.
John Bishop & Imran Aijaz (2004). 'How to Answer the "de Jure" Question About Christian Belief. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 56 (2/3):109 - 129.
Wai-hung Wong (2008). Meaningfulness and Identities. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (2):123-148.
Sara Rachel Chant (2006). The Special Composition Question in Action. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):422–441.
Paul K. Moser (2000). Skepticism, Question Begging, and Burden Shifting. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:209-217.
Ryan Wasserman & Dennis Whitcomb (2011). The Paradox of the Question. Philosophical Studies 154 (1):149-159.
Dominic McIver Lopes (2008). Nobody Needs a Theory of Art. Journal of Philosophy 105 (3):109-127.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads8 ( #123,218 of 549,550 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,550 )
How can I increase my downloads?