Ethics and instrumentalism: A response to Janna Thompson

Environmental Ethics 13 (2):139-149 (1991)
I argue that Janna Thompson’s critique of environmental ethics misrepresents the work of certain proponents of non-instrumental value theory and overlooks the ways in which intrinsie values have been related to valuers and their preferences. Some of the difficulties raised for environmental ethics (e.g., individuation) are real but would only be fatal if environmental ethics could not be supplemented by a wider environmental philosophy and practice. The proper context and motivation for the development of non-instrumental theories is not that of an objectivist value theory but rejection of the human domination and chauvinism involved in even the broadest instrumental accounts of nature as spiritual resource
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/enviroethics199113227
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
William Grey (1993). Anthropocentrism and Deep Ecology. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (4):463 – 475.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

14 ( #186,222 of 1,727,288 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #136,556 of 1,727,288 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.