Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 7 (1):77-82 (1994)
|Abstract||Professor Kathryn George's Use and Abuse Revisited does not contain an accurate assessment of my On Vegetarianism, Morality, and Science: A Counter Reply. I show that she has misrepresented my moral and empirical argumentation.|
|Keywords||vegetarianism vegan diet unequal rights view nutrition|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
George Nicholson (1801/1999). George Nicholson's on the Primeval Diet of Man (1801): Vegetarianism and Human Conduct Toward Animals. E. Mellen Press.
Sara Goering (2001). Michael Allen Fox, Deep Vegetarianism:Deep Vegetarianism. Ethics 111 (3):632-634.
Andrew Tardiff (1998). A Catholic Case for Vegetarianism. Faith and Philosophy 15 (2):210-222.
Kathryn Paxton George (1992). The Use and Abuse of Scientific Studies. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 (2):217-233.
Cathryn Bailey (2007). We Are What We Eat: Feminist Vegetarianism and the Reproduction of Racial Identity. Hypatia 22 (2):39-59.
David Detmer (2007). Vegetarianism, Traditional Morality, and Moral Conservatism. Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):39-48.
Kathryn Paxton George (1994). Use and Abuse Revisited: Response to Pluhar and Varner. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 7 (1):41-76.
Evelyn B. Pluhar (1993). On Vegetarianism, Morality, and Science: A Counter Reply. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6 (2):185-213.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #71,310 of 739,575 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,575 )
How can I increase my downloads?