The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
[Princeton, N.J.]Princeton University Press (1975)
The Machiavellian Moment is a classic study of the consequences for modern historical and social consciousness of the ideal of the classical republic revived by Machiavelli and other thinkers of Renaissance Italy. J.G.A. Pocock suggests that Machiavelli's prime emphasis was on the moment in which the republic confronts the problem of its own instability in time, and which he calls the "Machiavellian moment." After examining this problem in the thought of Machiavelli, Guicciardini, and Giannotti, Pocock turns to the revival of republican thought in Puritan England and in Revolutionary and Federalist America. He argues that the American Revolution can be considered the last great act of civic humanism of the Renaissance. He relates the origins of modern historicism to the clash between civic, Christian, and commercial values in the thought of the eighteenth century.
|Keywords||Political science History Political science History Political science History|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$115.86 used $640.78 new Amazon page|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Daniel Friedrich, Bryn Jaastad & Thomas S. Popkewitz (2010). Democratic Education: An (Im)Possibility That yet Remains to Come. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (5-6):571-587.
Stuart White (2011). The Republican Critique of Capitalism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (5):561-579.
David Elstein (2011). Han Feizi's Thought and Republicanism. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (2):167-185.
Fred R. Kaen, Allen Kaufman & Larry Zacharias (1988). American Political Values and Agency Theory: A Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 7 (11):805 - 820.
M. Victoria Costa (2013). Is Neo‐Republicanism Bad for Women? Hypatia 28 (4):921-936.
Similar books and articles
Paul A. Rahe (2006). Thomas Jefferson's Machiavellian Political Science. In Paul Anthony Rahe (ed.), Machiavelli's Liberal Republican Legacy. Cambridge University Press.
Ryan K. Balot (2006). Greek Political Thought. Blackwell Pub..
Iain Hampsher-Monk (1992). A History of Modern Political Thought: Major Political Thinkers From Hobbes to Marx. Oxford, Uk ;Blackwell.
Peter Samuel Donaldson (1988). Machiavelli and Mystery of State. Cambridge University Press.
Vickie B. Sullivan (1992). Machiavelli's Momentary "Machiavellian Moment": A Reconsideration of Pocock's Treatment of the Discourses. Political Theory 20 (2):309-318.
Johnson Kent Wright (1997). A Classical Republican in Eighteenth-Century France: The Political Thought of Mably. Stanford University Press.
Mark Jurdjevic (2008). Guardians of Republicanism: The Valori Family in the Florentine Renaissance. Oup Oxford.
Gisela Bock, Quentin Skinner & Maurizio Viroli (eds.) (1990). Machiavelli and Republicanism. Cambridge University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?