David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (1):88-98 (2007)
This paper considers the philosophical links between remembrance, apology, and reconciliation, as they pertain to Senate Resolution 39, which apologizes to the victims of lynching and their descendants. Although S. Res. 39 is admirable in its attempts to remember the senate’s role in supporting lynching by its failure to enact legislation, the resolution fails as an apology because it does not adequately support reconciliation. An adequate apology would require acts to ameliorate the harms that the past failures created, but S. Res. 39 is written in such a way that no action is required of the senate. This paper concludes by considering Congressman John Conyers, Jr.’s bill, H.R. 40: Commission to Study Reparation Proposals for African Americans Act. This bill takes the necessary steps to normalize American race relations, and if considered alongside of S. Res. 39, these two bills could lead to a more adequate understanding of the connection between remembrance, apology, and reconciliation
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Danielle Poe (2007). On U.S. Lynching: Remembrance, Apology, and Reconciliation. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (1):88-98.
David Gaertner (2011). “The Climax of Reconciliation”: Transgression, Apology, Forgiveness and the Body in Conflict Resolution. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (3):245-256.
Roberta Senechal de La Roche (2001). Why Is Collective Violence Collective? Sociological Theory 19 (2):126 - 144.
George Schedler (2007). Should There Be an Apology for American Slavery? Should There Be an Apology for American Slavery? 21 (2):125-148.
Trudier Harris-Lopez (2003). Lynching and Burning Rituals in African American Literature. In Tommy Lee Lott & John P. Pittman (eds.), A Companion to African-American Philosophy. Blackwell Pub..
Glen Pettigrove (2004). Unapologetic Forgiveness. American Philosophical Quarterly 41 (3):187 - 204.
Howard McGary (2003). Achieving Democratic Equality: Forgiveness, Reconciliation, and Reparations. [REVIEW] Journal of Ethics 7 (1):93-113.
Zenon Szablowinski (2011). Apology with and Without a Request for Forgiveness. Heythrop Journal 53 (5):731-741.
Jason M. Wirth (2006). Lactification and Lynching. International Studies in Philosophy 38 (4):143-154.
Alfred Pearce Dennis (1905). The Political and Ethical Aspects of Lynching. International Journal of Ethics 15 (2):149-161.
J. M. Bowker (2004). African-American Wildland Memories. Environmental Ethics 26 (1):57-75.
Maurice Hamington (2005). Public Pragmatism: Jane Addams and Ida B. Wells on Lynching. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 19 (2):167-174.
Cassandra Y. Johnson & J. M. Bowker (2004). African-American Wildland Memories. Environmental Ethics 26 (1):57-75.
Paul M. Hughes (2001). Moral Atrocity and Political Reconciliation. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (1):123-133.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads2 ( #337,655 of 1,096,898 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #164,383 of 1,096,898 )
How can I increase my downloads?