Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (3):335-352 (2011)
|Abstract||Two of the greatest challenges facing humanity are environmental degradation and the persistence of poverty. Both can be met by instituting a Global Resources Dividend (GRD) that would slow pollution and natural-resource depletion while collecting funds to avert poverty worldwide. Unlike Hillel Steiner's Global Fund, which is presented as a fully just regime governing the use of planetary resources, the GRD is meant as merely a modest but widely acceptable and therefore realistic step toward justice. Paula Casal has set forth various ways in which this step might be improved upon. Solid counter-arguments can be given to her criticisms and suggestions. But to specify the best (effective and realizable) design of an appropriate global institutional mechanism with some confidence, economists, political scientists, jurists, environmental scientists, and activists would need to be drawn in to help think through the immense empirical and political complexities posed by this urgent task|
|Keywords||GLOBAL WARMING FUTURE GENERATIONS POLLUTION NATURAL RESOURCES GLOBAL RESOURCES DIVIDEND CONSERVATION REGRESSIVITY PUBLIC GOODS|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paula Casal (2011). Global Taxes on Natural Resources. Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (3):307-327.
Thom Brooks (2007). Punishing States That Cause Global Poverty. William Mitchell Law Review 33 (2):519-32.
Tim Hayward (2005). Thomas Pogge’s Global Resources Dividend: A Critique and an Alternative. Journal of Moral Philosophy 2 (3):317-332.
Hillel Steiner (2011). The Global Fund: A Reply to Casal. Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (3):328-334.
Uwe Steinhoff (2012). Why ‘We’ Are Not Harming the Global Poor: A Critique of Pogge’s Leap From State to Individual Responsibility. Public Reason 4 (1-2):119-138.
Gillian Brock (2008). Taxation and Global Justice: Closing the Gap Between Theory and Practice. Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (2):161–184.
Steven Daskal (2013). Confining Pogge's Analysis of Global Poverty to Genuinely Negative Duties. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):369-391.
Mathias Risse (2005). Do We Owe the Global Poor Assistance or Rectification? Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1):9–18.
Scott Wisor (2012). Measuring Global Poverty: Toward a Pro-Poor Approach. Palgrave Macmillan.
Scott Wisor (2012). Poverty and Poverty Alleviation. In M. Juergensmeyer & H. K. Anheier (eds.), Encyclopedia of Global Studies. Sage.
Pablo Gilabert (2005). The Duty to Eradicate Global Poverty: Positive or Negative? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (5):537 - 550.
William K. Hartmann (1984). Space Exploration and Environmental Issues. Environmental Ethics 6 (3):227-239.
Kieran Oberman (2011). Immigration, Global Poverty and the Right to Stay. Political Studies 59 (2):253-268.
Christian Barry & Gerhard Øverland (2012). The Feasible Alternatives Thesis: Kicking Away the Livelihoods of the Global Poor. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (1):97-119.
C. Lafont (2009). Review Essay: Whose Poor Are the Global Poor?: Thomas Pogge, World Poverty and Human Rights, 2nd Edn (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008). [REVIEW] Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (8):1007-1013.
Added to index2011-10-18
Total downloads54 ( #22,473 of 722,704 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,344 of 722,704 )
How can I increase my downloads?