David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Ethics 4 (1-2):45-69 (2000)
A comparative examination of four alternative ways of understandingwhat human rights are supports an institutional understanding assuggested by Article 28 of the Universal Declaration: Human rightsare weighty moral claims on any coercively imposed institutionalorder, national or international (as Article 28 confirms). Any suchorder must afford the persons on whom it is imposed secure accessto the objects of their human rights. This understanding of humanrights is broadly sharable across cultures and narrows the philosophical and practical differences between the friends ofcivil and political and the champions of social, economic, andcultural human rights. When applied to the global institutionalorder, it provides a new argument for conceiving human rights asuniversal – and a new basis for criticizing this order as tooencouraging of oppression, corruption, and poverty in the developing countries: We have a negative duty not to cooperatein the imposition of this global order if feasible reforms ofit would significantly improve the realization of human rights.
|Keywords||cosmopolitanism cultural diversity democratic governance foreign lending global institutions human rights international law justice nationalism Universal Declaration universalism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Siegfried van Duffel (2013). Natural Rights to Welfare. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (4):641-664.
John J. Davenport (2011). Just War Theory, Humanitarian Intervention, and the Need for a Democratic Federation. Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (3):493-555.
T. Mertens (2002). From 'Perpetual Peace' to 'the Law of Peoples': Kant, Habermas and Rawls on International Relations. Kantian Review 6 (1):60-84.
Mathias Risse (2014). The Human Right to Water and Common Ownership of the Earth. Journal of Political Philosophy 22 (2):178-203.
Sarah Sorial (2008). Law, Cosmopolitan Law and the Protection of Human Rights. Journal of International Political Theory 4 (2):241-264.
Similar books and articles
Magnus Reitberger (2008). Poverty, Negative Duties and the Global Institutional Order. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (4):379-402.
Marcus Arvan (2012). Reconceptualizing Human Rights. Journal of Global Ethics 8 (1):91-105.
Joseph Wronka (1994). Human Rights and Social Policy in the United States: An Educational Agenda for the 21st Century. Journal of Moral Education 23 (3):261-272.
James Griffin (2001). The Presidential Address Discrepancies Between the Bestphilosophical Account of Human Rights and the International Law of Human Rights. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (1):1–28.
W. J. Talbott (2010). Human Rights and Human Well-Being. Oxford University Press.
Mayra Gómez (2003). Human Rights in Cuba, El Salvador, and Nicaragua: A Sociological Perspective on Human Rights Abuse. Routledge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads170 ( #9,210 of 1,725,806 )
Recent downloads (6 months)84 ( #10,569 of 1,725,806 )
How can I increase my downloads?