Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):215-215 (1998)
|Abstract||Chow's book makes a provocative contribution to the debate on the role of statistical significance, but it involves some important misconceptions in the presentation of the Fisher and Neyman/Pearson's theories. Moreover, the author's caricature-like considerations about “Bayesianism” are completely irrelevant for discarding the Bayesian statistical theory. These facts call into question the objectivity of his contribution.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Siu L. Chow (1998). The Null-Hypothesis Significance-Test Procedure is Still Warranted. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):228-235.
Fred L. Bookstein (1998). Statistical Significance Testing Was Not Meant for Weak Corroborations of Weaker Theories. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):195-196.
Judith Glück & Oliver Vitouch (1998). Stranded Statistical Paradigms: The Last Crusade. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):200-201.
Günther Palm (1998). Significance Testing – Does It Need This Defence? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):214-215.
Michael G. Shafto (1998). Costs and Benefits of Statistical Significance Tests. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):218-219.
Paul Snow (1998). Inductive Strategy and Statistical Tactics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):219-219.
Brian R. Lashley (1998). A Defense of Statistical Power Analysis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):209-210.
Helena Chmura Kraemer (1998). Statistical Significance: A Statistician's View. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):206-207.
David Sohn (2000). Does the Finding of Statistical Significance Justify the Rejection of the Null Hypothesis? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):293-294.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #214,631 of 751,836 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,000 of 751,836 )
How can I increase my downloads?