Counter-induction
Inquiry 5 (1-4):284 – 294 (1962)
| Abstract | This article attempts to show that certain alternatives that have been proposed to the classical principle of induction are necessarily inferior to it. The simplest versions of these ?counter?inductionist? policies are logically inconsistent, and consistent formulations are less reliable than the straight principle of induction | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesChase B. Wrenn (2006). Inter-World Probability and the Problem of Induction. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (3):387–402.
Daniel Steel (2011). On Not Changing the Problem: A Reply to Howson. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):285 - 291.
R. D. Rosenkrantz (1992). The Justification of Induction. Philosophy of Science 59 (4):527-539.
John Hosack (1991). On Probabilism and Induction. Topoi 10 (2):227-229.
James Hawthorne (1993). Bayesian Induction IS Eliminative Induction. Philosophical Topics 21 (1):99-138.
T. Parent (2013). Note on Induction. Think 12 (33):37-39.
R. Harré (1963). Counter-Induction. Theoria 29 (3):245-264.
Greg Bamford (1989). Watkins and the Pragmatic Problem of Induction. Analysis 49 (4):203 - 205..
Audun Öfsti (1962). Some Problems of Counter‐Inductive Policy as Opposed to Inductive. Inquiry 5 (1-4):267-283.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-03-05Total downloads7 ( #133,637 of 549,699 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,699 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
