Could it be the case that if I am right my opponents will be pleased? A rejoinder to Johnson-Laird, Byrne and girotto

Topoi 28 (1):81-85 (2009)
I take up the four issues considered by Johnson-Laird, Byrne and Girotto in their reply to Politzer ( 2007 ). Based on the conceptual clarification which they adduce, it seems that the disagreement can be settled about the first one (truth functionality) and can be attenuated about the second one (the paradoxes of material implication). However, I maintain and refine my criticisms on the last two (negation and the probability of conditionals), backed up by considerations borrowed from the perspective of the conditional probability semantics for conditionals.
Keywords Conditionals  Probability of conditionals  Negation of conditionals
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11245-008-9048-x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,658
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

33 ( #97,172 of 1,725,935 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

27 ( #35,185 of 1,725,935 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.