Concerning the integration of sciences: Kinds and stages [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal for General Philosophy of Science 26 (2):297 - 312 (1995)
The detailed analysis allows to discern seven kinds of integration, namely: I₁ consisting in the synthesis of scientific disciplines from their elements, including disciplinary unification I₁; I₂ inclusion of a science in (reduction to) another, more general; I₃ - links between different sciences, especially establishing of common elements; I₄ - interdisciplines bridging various sciences; I₅ - combination of two (or more) disciplines into a new (complex) science; I₆ - a general approach to several domains or multidisciplinary unification; I₇ - transdisciplinary sciences about relations of the same type in various traditional domains. These kinds of integration are interwoven with processes of differentiation, viz. D₁ - internal differentiation of the sciences resulting of I₁; D₂ - interdisciplinary differentiation concomitant I₄, and D₃ - specialization of I₇ sciences in several sections. As a result integration and differentiation are combined in the pairs I₁ - D₁, I₇ - D₃, and D₂ - I₄. The processes of integration (and differentiation) may be presented schematically in the following (not strictly isolated one of another) sequence: in the 17th century started I₁ followed by D₁, and in the last decades by I₁'; during the 18th and the 19th c. cases of I₂ and I₃ appear; I₄ (together with D₂) is unfolding since the late 19th century. Finally, I₇ (and D₃), as well as I₅ and I₆ pertain to the latter half of our century. Representative are for one thing I₁, I₄, and I₇ outlining the main stages of integration and at the same time connected with respective kinds of differentiation
|Keywords||differentiation integration (kinds, stages) interdisciplines levels of reality multidisciplines reduction reductionism sciences (disciplines, links, unification) transdisciplinary domains|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dale J. Cohen & Michael Kubovy (1999). Even Feature Integration is Cognitively Impenetrable. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):371-372.
William Bechtel (1993). Integrating Sciences by Creating New Disciplines: The Case of Cell Biology. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 8 (3):277-299.
William P. Bechtel & Andrew Hamilton (2007). Reduction, Integration, and the Unity of Science: Natural, Behavioral, and Social Sciences and the Humanities. In T. Kuipers (ed.), Philosophy of Science: Focal Issues (Volume 1 of the Handbook of the Philosophy of Science). Elsevier.
G. M. Innocenti (1997). “Differentiationism” Can Reconcile Selectionism and Constructivism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):568-569.
Ingo Brigandt (2010). Beyond Reduction and Pluralism: Toward an Epistemology of Explanatory Integration in Biology. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 73 (3):295-311.
Cor Weele (1993). Explaining Embryological Development: Should Integration Be the Goal? [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 8 (4):385-397.
Calvin O. Schrag (1980). Radical Reflection and the Origin of the Human Sciences. Purdue University Press.
Ladislav Tondl (2007). Rational Actions and the Integration of Knowledge. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 38 (1):91 - 110.
Rebecca Sear, David W. Lawson & Thomas E. Dickins, Synthesis in the Human Evolutionary Behavioural Sciences.
John Lazarus (2003). Let's Cooperate to Understand Cooperation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):169-170.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #254,377 of 1,008,333 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,735 of 1,008,333 )
How can I increase my downloads?