David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 17 (1):32-44 (1997)
Addresses the issue of transference from a Lacanian perspective and discusses the implications which transference has in working with criminal clients. The article begins by briefly discussing the constitution of Lacanian subjectivity which includes a discussion of J. Lacan's concepts of the imaginary and symbolic orders. The idea of transference is then situated between the play of the imaginary and symbolic orders which constantly asks the question, what does the Other want. This question is especially important in the therapeutic work with criminal Ss, and reveals certain countertransference possibilities which when left unexplored, can greatly threaten the success of the treatment. 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
|Keywords||Lacanian perspective of transference in psychotherapy, criminal clients|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ed Pluth (2006). Lacan's Subversion of the Subject. Continental Philosophy Review 39 (3):293-312.
John P. Muller (1992). Lecture 3. Transference and Lacan's Subject-Supposed-to-Know. In John P. Muller & Richard Rojcewicz (eds.), Phenomenology and Lacanian Psychoanalysis: The Eighth Annual Symposium of the Simon Silverman Phenomenology Center. Simon Silverman Phenomenology Center, Duquesne University
María José García-Encinas (2004). Transference, or Identiry Theories of Causation? Theoria 19 (1):31-47.
María José García-Encinas (2004). Transference, or Identity Theories of Causation? Theoria 19 (1):31-47.
Carolyn J. Dean (1992). The Self and its Pleasures: Bataille, Lacan, and the History of the Decentered Subject. Cornell University Press.
Claudia Leeb (2009). The Im-Possibility of a Feminist Subject. Social Philosophy Today 25:47-60.
Phil Dowe (1995). What's Right and What's Wrong with Transference Theories. Erkenntnis 42 (3):363 - 374.
Douglas Husak (2008). Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content? [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):99-122.
Ian Parker (2010). The Place of Transference in Psychosocial Research. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 30 (1):17-31.
Rudolf Bernet (2000). Le Sujet Traumatisé. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2.
Richard A. Lynch (2008). The Alienating Mirror: Toward a Hegelian Critique of Lacan on Ego-Formation. [REVIEW] Human Studies 31 (2):209 - 221.
Herwig C. H. Hofmann, Enforcement of Eu Law and National Criminal Law - Legal Problems in Composite Procedures.
William Franke (1998). Psychoanalysis as a Hermeneutics of the Subject: Freud, Ricoeur, Lacan. Dialogue 37 (01):65-.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads8 ( #276,630 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?