Graduate studies at Western
Theory and Decision 57 (2):79-107 (2004)
|Abstract||Counterexamples are constructed for classical decision theory, turning on the fact that actions must often be chosen in groups rather than individually, i.e., the objects of rational choice are plans. It is argued that there is no way to define optimality for plans that makes the finding of optimal plans the desideratum of rational decision-making. An alternative called “locally global planning” is proposed as a replacement for classical decision theory. Decision-making becomes a non-terminating process without a precise target rather than a terminating search for an optimal solution|
|Keywords||AI alternatives optimality plans rationality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Scott Shapiro (2011). Legality. Harvard University Press.
Peter Lewin (1997). Hayekian Equilibrium and Change. Journal of Economic Methodology 4 (2):245-266.
Michael McDermott (2008). Are Plans Necessary? Philosophical Studies 138 (2):225 - 232.
John L. Pollock (2002). Rational Choice and Action Omnipotence. Philosophical Review 111 (1):1-23.
John L. Pollock (1992). New Foundations for Practical Reasoning. Minds and Machines 2 (2):113-144.
John L. Pollock, Against Optimality: Logical Foundations for Decision-Theoretic Planning in Autonomous Agents.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #95,561 of 739,303 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,029 of 739,303 )
How can I increase my downloads?