David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
A rational agent (artificial or otherwise) residing in a complex changing environment must gather information perceptually, update that information as the world changes, and combine that information with causal information to reason about the changing world. Using the system of defeasible reasoning that is incorporated into the OSCAR architecture for rational agents, a set of reasonschemas is proposed for enabling an agent to perform some of the requisite reasoning. Along the way, solutions are proposed for the Frame Problem, the Qualification Problem, and the Ramification Problem. The principles and reasoning described have all been implemented in OSCAR.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Brigitte Smith (1998). Ethics of du Pont's CFC Strategy 1975–1995. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (5):103-114.
Nicholas Asher (1994). Problems with Persistence. Topoi 13 (1):37-49.
Robert L. Causey (2003). Computational Dialogic Defeasible Reasoning. Argumentation 17 (4):421-450.
H. Nakashima (1999). AI as Complex Information Processing. Minds and Machines 9 (1):57-80.
John Zeleznikow, George Vossos & Daniel Hunter (1993). The IKBALS Project: Multi-Modal Reasoning in Legal Knowledge Based Systems. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (3):169-203.
Richard W. Weyhrauch, Marco Cadoli & Carolyn L. Talcott (1998). Using Abstract Resources to Control Reasoning. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (1):77-101.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #147,371 of 1,011,176 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,700 of 1,011,176 )
How can I increase my downloads?