Physicalism, the philosophical foundations

New York: Oxford University Press (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Physicalism is a program for building a unified system of knowledge about the world on the basis of the view that everything is a manifestation of the physical aspects of existence. Jeffrey Poland presents a systematic and comprehensive exploration of the philosophical foundations of this program. He investigates the core ideas, motivating values, and presuppositions of physicalism; the constraints upon an adequate formulation of physicalist doctrine; the epistemological and modal status, the scope, and the methodological roles of physicalist principles. He reviews and evaluates major objections to the program, and considers its significance for philosophy, science, society, and individual persons. He also examines the relations between physicalism and other philosophical positions, such as realism, empiricism, and relativism, and suggests that physicalism is compatible with a tolerant pluralism in the philosophical, cultural, and personal domains.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Chapters

Significance of the Physicalist Programme

This chapter surveys aspects of the significance of the physicalist programme for philosophy, science, culture, and the individual. This is a less systematic and less comprehensive discussion than that which preceded it, but it is, none the less, important for gaining some insight into why... see more

Similar books and articles

Being a physicalist: How and (more importantly) why.Andrew Melnyk - 1994 - Philosophical Studies 74 (2):221-241.
How to be a (sort of) A Priori physicalist.D. Gene Witmer - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 131 (1):185-225.
Physicalism and overdetermination.Scott Sturgeon - 1998 - Mind 107 (426):411-432.
The percept and vector function theories of the brain.Jeff Foss - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (December):511-537.
Could a Classical Theist Be a Physicalist?William F. Vallicella - 1998 - Faith and Philosophy 15 (2):160-180.
What is token physicalism?Noa Latham - 2003 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (3):270-290.
Non-reductive physicalism?A. D. Smith - 1993 - In Howard M. Robinson (ed.), Objections to Physicalism. Oxford University Press.
From physics to physicalism.Barry Loewer - 2001 - In Carl Gillett & Barry Loewer (eds.), Physicalism and its Discontents. Cambridge University Press.
What is physicalism?Benedikt Paul Göcke - 2009 - Ratio 22 (3):291-307.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
213 (#90,761)

6 months
14 (#167,656)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Is there a fundamental level?Jonathan Schaffer - 2003 - Noûs 37 (3):498–517.
Construction area (no hard hat required).Karen Bennett - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (1):79-104.
Metaphysical emergence: Weak and Strong.Jessica Wilson - 2015 - In Tomasz Bigaj & Christian Wüthrich (eds.), Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities. pp. 251-306.
When is parsimony a virtue.Michael Huemer - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (235):216-236.
On characterizing the physical.Jessica Wilson - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 131 (1):61-99.

View all 57 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references