|Abstract||In the early years of the 1990s, a number of philosophers and cognitive scientists became enthused about the idea that mental states are spatially and temporally distributed in the brain, and that this has significant consequences for philosophy of mind. Daniel Dennett (1991), for example, appealed to the spatial and temporal distribution of cognitive processes in the brain in order to argue that there is no unified place where or time when consciousness occurs in the brain. Dennett used this interim conclusion as a premise in a series of arguments designed to undermine what he calls the “Cartesian Theater” view of consciousness, according to which there is an independent and fact of the matter about when and where conscious mental states occur. Most famously, Dennett argues that anyone who believes there are such facts of the matter must choose between “Orwellian” and “Stalinesque” theories of the timing of consciousness, in order to accommodate certain data about the spatial distribution of the timing of consciousness-related brain events. But, he claims, that distinction is a distinction without a difference: The choice between “Orwellian” and “Stalinesque” views is either nonsense, or at the very least one that we could never be justified in making. And this, Dennett takes it, is a reductio ad absurdum of any theory of consciousness that says there is a fact of the matter about when and where is occurs|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Roland Puccetti (1993). Dennett on the Split-Brain. Psycoloquy 4 (52).
William E. Seager (1993). Verification, Skepticism, and Consciousness. Inquiry 36 (1-2):113-133.
Michael Lockwood (1993). Dennett's Mind. Inquiry 36 (1-2):59-72.
Jonathan Opie (1999). A Defense of Cartesian Materialism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):939 - 963.
Daniel C. Dennett (2001). Are We Explaining Consciousness Yet? Cognition 79 (1):221-37.
Antti Revonsuo (1993). Is There a Ghost in the Cognitive Machinery? Philosophical Psychology 6 (4):387-405.
Steven J. Todd (2009). A Difference That Makes a Difference: Passing Through Dennett's Stalinesque/Orwellian Impasse. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):497-520.
S. J. Todd (2006). Unmasking Multiple Drafts. Philosophical Psychology 19 (4):477-494.
John Barresi & John R. Christie (2002). Using Illusory Line Motion to Differentiate Misrepresentation (Stalinesque) and Misremembering (Orwellian) Accounts of Consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 11 (2):347-365.
Added to index2010-08-19
Total downloads14 ( #90,504 of 722,862 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,862 )
How can I increase my downloads?