``The Paradox of the Preface"

Philosophy of Science 53 (2):246-258 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a number of recent papers I have been developing the theory of “nomic probability,“ which is supposed to be the kind of probability involved in statistical laws of nature. One of the main principles of this theory is an acceptance rule explicitly designed to handle the lottery paradox. This paper shows that the rule can also handle the paradox of the preface. The solution proceeds in part by pointing out a surprising connection between the paradox of the preface and the gambler's fallacy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The paradox of the preface.John L. Pollock - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (2):246-258.
The preface paradox revisited.Igor Douven - 2003 - Erkenntnis 59 (3):389 - 420.
The preface paradox dissolved.John N. Williams - 1987 - Theoria 53 (2-3):121-140.
The paradox of the preface.A. R. Lacey - 1970 - Mind 79 (316):614-615.
``The Paradox of the Preface".D. C. Makinson - 1964 - Analysis 25 (6):205-207.
A note on the paradox of the preface.Christopher New - 1978 - Philosophical Quarterly 28 (113):341-344.
The preface paradox.Sharon Ryan - 1991 - Philosophical Studies 64 (3):293-307.
Surveyability and the Preface Paradox.Michael Hand - 1996 - Southwest Philosophy Review 12 (1):171-179.
"Rethinking" the preface of the tractatus.Bruce Howes - 2006 - Philosophical Investigations 30 (1):3–24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-29

Downloads
11 (#1,105,752)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Pollock
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

Justification, knowledge, and normality.Clayton Littlejohn & Julien Dutant - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (6):1593-1609.
Bootstrapping in General.Jonathan Weisberg - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (3):525-548.
Rational requirements for suspended judgment.Luis Rosa - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (2):385-406.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references