Selected Ethical Issues in the Analysis and Reporting of Research: Survey of Business School Faculty in Malaysia [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Academic Ethics 9 (4):307-322 (2011)
This study reports the perceptions of business school faculty on ethical behaviors related to data analysis and research reporting as well as the prevalence of such behaviors in their academic environment. Survey data for the study were obtained from a sample of 102 business school faculty from five government-funded universities in Malaysia. Study results showed that a majority of the respondents considered practices such as fabrication, manipulation, and distortion of data to be ethically unacceptable, and these behaviors were reported to be least prevalent. In contrast, the practice of misapplying statistical techniques was considered ethically acceptable and reported to be quite prevalent. On research reporting, although a majority of the respondents agreed that plagiarism and taking undeserved authorship credit were ethically unacceptable, they also reported having observed the frequent occurrence of such behaviors. Finally, practices such as cutting up research data and simultaneous submissions to more than one publication outlet at the same time were less likely to be viewed as unethical and seen to be quite a common practice. In general, the findings of this study indicate that the perceptions of the ethicality and frequency of occurrence of behaviors related to data analysis and research reporting vary among business school faculty
|Keywords||Research ethics Ethical perceptions of business faculty Unethical research behavior among business faculty Code of ethics Malaysia|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Susan C. Borkowski & Mary Jeanne Welsh (2000). Ethical Practice in the Accounting Publishing Process: Contrasting Opinions of Authors and Editors. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 25 (1):15 - 31.
Pierre Cossette (2004). Research Integrity: An Exploratory Survey of Administrative Science Faculties. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 49 (3):213-234.
Tao Gao, Philip Siegel, J. S. Johar & M. Joseph Sirgy (2008). A Survey of Management Educators' Perceptions of Unethical Faculty Behavior. Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):129-152.
J. L. Gupta & Mohamed Sulaiman (1996). Ethical Orientations of Managers in Malaysia. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (7):735 - 748.
Malhar N. Kumar (2008). A Review of the Types of Scientific Misconduct in Biomedical Research. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (3):211-228.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Chet Robie & Roland E. Kidwell (2003). The “Ethical” Professor and the Undergraduate Student: Current Perceptions of Moral Behavior Among Business School Faculty. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (2):153-173.
Linda A. Kidwell & Roland E. Kidwell (2008). Do the Numbers Add Up to Different Views? Perceptions of Ethical Faculty Behavior Among Faculty in Quantitative Versus Qualitative Disciplines. Journal of Business Ethics 78 (1-2):141 - 151.
Y. Ilker Topcu (2010). Have Ethical Perceptions Changed? A Comparative Study on the Ethical Perceptions of Turkish Faculty Members. Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (2):137-151.
Robert E. Stevens, O. Jeff Harris & Stan Williamson (1993). A Comparison of Ethical Evaluations of Business School Faculty and Students: A Pilot Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 12 (8):611 - 619.
Corrine R. Sackett (2010). Authorship in Student-Faculty Collaborative Research: Perceptions of Current and Best Practices. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):199-215.
Laura Welfare & Corrine Sackett (2010). Authorship in Student-Faculty Collaborative Research: Perceptions of Current and Best Practices. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):199-215.
Christopher J. Cowton & Thomas W. Dunfee (1995). Internationalizing the Business Ethics Curriculum: A Survey. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 14 (5):331 - 338.
Ove D. Jakobsen, Knut J. Ims & Kjell Grønhaug (2005). Faculty Members' Attitudes Towards Ethics at Norwegian Business Schools: An Explorative Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 62 (3):299 - 314.
Kazi Firoz Alam (1995). Attitudes Towards Business Ethics of Business Students in Malaysia. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (4):309 - 313.
Susan Eastwood, Pamela Derish, Evangeline Leash & Stephen Ordway (1996). Ethical Issues in Biomedical Research: Perceptions and Practices of Postdoctoral Research Fellows Responding to a Survey. Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (1):89-114.
J. E. Nelson & P. L. Kiecker (1996). Marketing Research Interviewers and Their Perceived Necessity of Moral Compromise. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (10):1107 - 1117.
Allen Hall & Lisa Berardino (2006). Teaching Professional Behaviors: Differences in the Perceptions of Faculty, Students, and Employers. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 63 (4):407 - 415.
Roger L. Worthington, Jeffrey Andreas Tan & Karen Poulin (2002). Ethically Questionable Behaviors Among Supervisees: An Exploratory Investigation. Ethics and Behavior 12 (4):323 – 351.
Chet Robie, Roland E. Kidwell Jr & James A. Kling (2003). The Ethics of Professorial Book Selling: Morality, Money and "Black Market" Books. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 47 (2):61 - 76.
Steven A. Branstetter & Mitchell M. Handelsman (2000). Graduate Teaching Assistants: Ethical Training, Beliefs, and Practices. Ethics and Behavior 10 (1):27 – 50.
Added to index2011-07-12
Total downloads7 ( #195,012 of 1,101,922 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #91,857 of 1,101,922 )
How can I increase my downloads?