Should faculty members be exempt from a mandate to receive instructional design training because of their rights under academic freedom?
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (3):223-230 (2009)
The quality of the educational experience for students may be at risk if they are not taught in ways that are effective and pertinent. While educational institutions (administrators, faculty senates or a combination) may try to compel faculty members to gain knowledge of and utilize up-to-date learning and instructional design strategies, these faculty members may baulk at this mandate, citing academic freedom as their right to design their courses in any way they see fit. Following is a discussion exploring the issue, suggesting that regardless of how academic freedom is interpreted, faculty members have an ethical obligation to deliver instruction in ways that do not violate students' rights to learn. Consequently, institutions have a right as well as a duty to compel their faculty members to follow through with this obligation.
|Keywords||Academic freedom Instructional design Faculty members ethical obligations|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nancy A. Walton, Alexander G. Karabanow & Jehangir Saleh (2008). Students as Members of University-Based Academic Research Ethics Boards: A Natural Evolution. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):117-127.
Anita M. Superson (2007). Teaching in the New Climate of Conservatism. Teaching Philosophy 30 (2):139-148.
A. Walton Nancy, G. Karabanow Alexander & Jehangir Saleh (2008). Students as Members of University-Based Academic Research Ethics Boards: A Natural Evolution. Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2).
Stephen J. Ceci, Wendy M. Williams & Katrin Mueller-Johnson (2006). Is Tenure Justified? An Experimental Study of Faculty Beliefs About Tenure, Promotion, and Academic Freedom. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):553-569.
Emanuel Donchin (2006). The Constraints of Academic Politics Are Not Violations of Academic Freedom. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):572-573.
Melissa S. Anderson, Elo Charity Oju & Tina M. R. Falkner (2001). Help From Faculty: Findings From the Acadia Institute Graduate Education Study. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (4):487-503.
Evan Simpson (2003). The Faculty of the Future. Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (1):49-58.
Ruth Anne Baumgartner (2003). Orienteering in Wonderland: Ethical Decision-Making by Faculty in the UB Strike. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (3):295-322.
Arthur Coren (2011). Turning a Blind Eye: Faculty Who Ignore Student Cheating. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 9 (4):291-305.
Y. Ilker Topcu (2010). Have Ethical Perceptions Changed? A Comparative Study on the Ethical Perceptions of Turkish Faculty Members. Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (2):137-151.
Added to index2009-06-10
Total downloads16 ( #116,466 of 1,410,123 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #107,970 of 1,410,123 )
How can I increase my downloads?