A note on the difference between the lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction and the Einstein contraction
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (64):332-333 (1966)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Adolf Grünbaum (1959). The Falsifiability of the Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction Hypothesis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):48-50.
Herbert Dingle (1959). The Falsifiability of the Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction Hypothesis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (39):228-229.
Raghav Ramachandran, Abhaya C. Nayak & Mehmet A. Orgun (2012). Three Approaches to Iterated Belief Contraction. Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (1):115-142.
Herman Erlichson (1971). The Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction Hypothesis and the Combined Rod Contraction-Clock Retardation Hypothesis. Philosophy of Science 38 (4):605-609.
Harvey R. Brown (2001). The Origins of Length Contraction: I. The Fitzgerald-Lorentz Deformation Hypothesis. American Journal of Physics 69:1044-1054.
Melbourne G. Evans (1969). On the Falsity of the Fitzgerald-Lorentz Contraction Hypothesis. Philosophy of Science 36 (4):354-362.
Dennis Dieks (1984). The “Reality” of the Lorentz Contraction. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 15 (2):330-342.
Sven Ove Hansson (2010). Multiple and Iterated Contraction Reduced to Single-Step Single-Sentence Contraction. Synthese 173 (2).
Adolf Grünbaum (1959). Discussions: Thb Falsifiability Op the Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction Hypothesis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):48-50.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads14 ( #83,117 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |

