Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||It is not a paper on linguistic analysis (the analysis of word-usages). For I completely reject the claim of certain language analysts that the source of philosophical difficulties is to be found in the misuse of language. No doubt some people talk nonsense, but I claim (a) that there does not exist a logical or language-analytical method of detecting philosophical nonsense (which, by the way, does not stop short of the ranks of logicians, language analysts and semanticists); (b) that the belief that such a method exists -- the belief more especially that philosophical nonsense can be unmasked as due to what Russell might have called 'type-mistakes' and what nowadays are sometimes called 'category-mistakes' -- is the aftermath of a philosophy of language which has since turned out to be baseless|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gordon P. Baker (1984). Language, Sense and Nonsense: A Critical Investigation Into Modern Theories of Language. B. Blackwell.
M. Shabbir Ahsen, Private Language Questions in Contemporary Analytical Philosophy Analytical Study of Wittgenstein's Treatments of Private Language and its Implications.
Benny Shanon (2008). Mind-Body, Body-Mind: Two Distinct Problems. Philosophical Psychology 21 (5):697 – 701.
Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska (1998). Logical and Philosophical Ideas in Certain Formal Approaches to Language. Synthese 116 (2):231-277.
Christian Emden (2005). Nietzsche on Language, Consciousness, and the Body. University of Illinois Press.
Noam Chomsky (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #29,033 of 739,392 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,392 )
How can I increase my downloads?