Science: Conjectures and refutations
| Abstract | “There could be no fairer destiny for any. . . theory than that it should point the way to a more comprehensive theory in which it lives on, as a limiting case.” ALBERT EINSTEIN.. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesHerbert Keuth (1978). Methodologische Regeln Des Kritischen Rationalismus. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 9 (2):236-255.
Siu L. Chow (1987). Science, Ecological Validity and Experimentation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 17 (2):181–194.
Joseph Agassi (1981). To Save Verisimilitude. Mind 90 (360):576-579.
Robert Hoffman (1962). Conjectures and Refutations on the Ontological Status of the Work of Art. Mind 71 (284):512-520.
Joseph Agassi (1980). Between Science and Technology. Philosophy of Science 47 (1):82-99.
Adolf Grünbaum (1976). Is the Method of Bold Conjectures and Attempted Refutations Justifiably the Method of Science? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (2):105-136.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads96 ( #6,738 of 549,093 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,228 of 549,093 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
