The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||Science Philosophy Physics Philosophy Rationalism Reason|
|Buy the book||$17.00 used (26% off) $121.41 new Amazon page|
|Call number||Q175.P8633 1994|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Stephen P. Stich (1979). Between Chomskian Rationalism and Popperian Empiricism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (December):329-47.
Gunnar Andersson (1994). Criticism and the History of Science: Kuhn's, Lakatos's, and Feyrabend's Criticisms of Critical Rationalism. E.J. Brill.
Edward Stein (1996). Without Good Reason: The Rationality Debate in Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press.
Doan Travann (2001). Reason, Rationality, and Reasonableness. Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
Darrell P. Rowbottom (2011). Popper's Critical Rationalism: A Philosophical Investigation. Routledge.
John G. McEvoy (1995). The Myth of the Framework. In Defense of Science and Rationality. Teaching Philosophy 18 (4):388-390.
W. Newton-Smith (1981). The Rationality of Science. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Stefano Gattei (2009). Karl Popper's Philosophy of Science: Rationality Without Foundations. Routledge.
John Watkins (1996). The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality Karl R. Popper, Edited by M. A. Notturno London and New York: Routledge, Xiii + 229 Pp. £27.50.Knowledge and the Body-Mind Problem: In Defence of Interaction Karl R. Popper, Edited by M. A. Notturno London and New York: Routledge, Ix + 158 Pp. £25. [REVIEW] Philosophy 71 (276):315-.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?