David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In a career spanning sixty years, Sir Karl Popper has made some of the most important contributions to the twentieth century discussion of science and rationality. The Myth of the Framework is a new collection of some of Popper's most important material on this subject. Sir Karl discusses such issues as the aims of science, the role that it plays in our civilization, the moral responsibility of the scientist, the structure of history, and the perennial choice between reason and revolution. In doing so, he attacks intellectual fashions (like positivism) that exagerrate what science and rationality have done, as well as intellectual fashions (like relativism) that denigrate what science and rationality can do. Scientific knowledge, according to Popper, is one of the most rational and creative of human achievements, but it is also inherently fallible and subject to revision. In place of intellectual fashions, Popper offers his own critical rationalism - a view that he regards both as a theory of knowlege and as an attitude towards human life, human morals and democracy. Published in cooperation with the Central European University
|Keywords||Science Philosophy Physics Philosophy Rationalism Reason|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$19.78 used (14% off) $35.90 new (34% off) $45.58 direct from Amazon (16% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||Q175.P8633 1994|
|ISBN(s)||0415113202 9780415135559 0415135559 9780203535806|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Howard Sankey (2011). Epistemic Relativism and the Problem of the Criterion. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):562-570.
Boaz Miller (2012). The Rationality Principle Idealized. Social Epistemology 26 (1):3-30.
Minkang Kim & Derek Sankey (2009). Towards a Dynamic Systems Approach to Moral Development and Moral Education: A Response to the JME Special Issue, September 2008. Journal of Moral Education 38 (3):283-298.
Joanna Swann (2009). Learning: An Evolutionary Analysis. Educational Philosophy and Theory 41 (3):256-269.
Chi-Ming Lam (2007). Is Popper's Falsificationist Heuristic a Helpful Resource for Developing Critical Thinking? Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (4):432–448.
Similar books and articles
Stephen P. Stich (1979). Between Chomskian Rationalism and Popperian Empiricism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (December):329-47.
John Watkins (1996). The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality Karl R. Popper, Edited by M. A. Notturno London and New York: Routledge, Xiii + 229 Pp. £27.50.Knowledge and the Body-Mind Problem: In Defence of Interaction Karl R. Popper, Edited by M. A. Notturno London and New York: Routledge, Ix + 158 Pp. £25. [REVIEW] Philosophy 71 (276):315-.
Stefano Gattei (2009). Karl Popper's Philosophy of Science: Rationality Without Foundations. Routledge.
W. Newton-Smith (1981). The Rationality of Science. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
John G. McEvoy (1995). The Myth of the Framework. In Defense of Science and Rationality. Teaching Philosophy 18 (4):388-390.
Darrell P. Rowbottom (2011). Popper's Critical Rationalism: A Philosophical Investigation. Routledge.
Doan Travann (2001). Reason, Rationality, and Reasonableness. Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
Edward Stein (1996). Without Good Reason: The Rationality Debate in Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press.
Gunnar Andersson (1994). Criticism and the History of Science: Kuhn's, Lakatos's, and Feyrabend's Criticisms of Critical Rationalism. E.J. Brill.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #123,603 of 1,796,306 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #97,741 of 1,796,306 )
How can I increase my downloads?