David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In this paper complexity theory and complex adaptive systems are examined as a conceptual and empirical framework for sustainability and the sustainable commons. In contrast to traditional reductionist approaches, complexity theory provides a view in which nested and intertwined social, environmental, economic and cultural systems are in continual flux and coevolutionary development, and where change is emergent, the result of ongoing multidirectional contact and feedback among networks of agents of many types. The implications of this ontology are that sustainability is defined more in terms of processes rather than performance measures or final goals, and inquiry focuses on the contexts, patterns, networks, and relational aspects and mechanisms of micro and macro sustainability processes. The paper presents an overview of complexity theory, situates and examines sustainability in a complexity ‘mindset’ (Richardson, 2008), and discusses three important research tools for a complexity analysis of sustainability—social construction, identity work, and social network analysis
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Louise Metcalf & Sue Benn (2013). Leadership for Sustainability: An Evolution of Leadership Ability. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 112 (3):369-384.
Marcel van Marrewijk & Marco Werre (2003). Multiple Levels of Corporate Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2-3):107-119.
Marcel Van Marrewijk & Marco Werre (2003). Multiple Levels of Corporate Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2/3):107 - 119.
Frank C. Krysiak (2009). Risk Management as a Tool for Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (3):483 - 492.
John Gowdy (2001). Strong Versus Weak Sustainability. Environmental Ethics 23 (2):155-168.
Joseph Tainter (2003). A Framework for Sustainability. World Futures 59 (3 & 4):213 – 223.
Peter Stewart (2001). Complexity Theories, Social Theory, and the Question of Social Complexity. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (3):323-360.
Michel Puech (2011). Sustainability Means Ethics and This Is a Cultural Revolution. In Almlund Pernille (ed.), Rethinking Climate Change Research: Clean-Technology, Culture and Communication. Ashgate.
Robert Ayres, Jeroen van den Berrgh & John Gowdy (2001). Strong Versus Weak Sustainability: Economics, Natural Sciences, and Consilience. Environmental Ethics 23 (2):155-168.
Tobias Hahn & Frank Figge (2011). Beyond the Bounded Instrumentality in Current Corporate Sustainability Research: Toward an Inclusive Notion of Profitability. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 104 (3):325-345.
Marcel Van Marrewijk & Teun W. Hardjono (2003). European Corporate Sustainability Framework for Managing Complexity and Corporate Transformation. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2/3):121 - 132.
Marcel van Marrewijk & Teun W. Hardjono (2003). European Corporate Sustainability Framework for Managing Complexity and Corporate Transformation. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2-3):121-132.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads2 ( #361,786 of 1,099,914 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #190,037 of 1,099,914 )
How can I increase my downloads?