David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (1995)
How do we determine whether an action is right or wrong? Until recently, philosophers assumed that this question could be answered by means of a theory of morality, which set forth clearly established rules for moral behaviour. More recently, however, a number of philosophers have challenged a theory of morality in this sense. Porter is sympathetic to their criticisms but questions whether they go far enough in offering a positive alternative to a modern view of the moral act. She argues that the work of Aquinas offers an alternative account of moral rationality, in terms of which moral reasoning is understood as dialectical rather than deductive, and questions are resolved in a wider context of ethical thought. Aquinas's account of the moral virtues and prudence is seen to offer unexpected insights into the relationship between moral rules and the practice of the virtues, thus contributing to our own moral reflection.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$4.00 used (92% off) $29.98 new (38% off) $42.72 direct from Amazon (11% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BJ1251.P66 1995|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Richard B. Miller (2009). Killing, Self-Defense, and Bad Luck. Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (1):131-158.
Similar books and articles
J. E. Hare (1996). The Moral Gap: Kantian Ethics, Human Limits, and God's Assistance. Oxford University Press.
John Hill (1981). Christian Moral Education. Journal of Religious Ethics 9 (1):103 - 117.
Peter S. Gedge (1982). Christian Contributions to Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 11 (4):266-273.
Svend Andersen (2001). Theological Ethics, Moral Philosophy, and Natural Law. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (4):349-364.
James M. Gustafson (1974). Theology and Christian Ethics. Philadelphia,United Church Press.
Jean Porter (1998). Review: Recent Studies in Aquinas's Virtue Ethic: A Review Essay. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (1):189 - 215.
N. Biggar (1996). Book Reviews : Moral Action and Christian Ethics, by Jean Porter. New Studies in Christian Ethics. Cambridge, CUP, 1995. Xvi+235pp. Hb. 35. [REVIEW] Studies in Christian Ethics 9 (2):119-123.
William O'Neill (1993). The Distinctiveness of Christian Morality. Philosophy and Theology 7 (4):405-423.
Jean Porter (1989). Moral Rules and Moral Actions: A Comparison of Aquinas and Modern Moral Theology. Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (1):123 - 149.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #168,292 of 1,098,598 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #173,848 of 1,098,598 )
How can I increase my downloads?