Graduate studies at Western
Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (2):4-19 (2011)
|Abstract||Our paper proposes to analyze from a semiotic perspective the process of communication, as conceived within the Palo Alto Group. We will firstly show that, as a result of the Group‟s critiques and revisions of the linear or mechanistic theories of communication, new perspectives are brought about for the essential axes of transformation within communication: we do not communicate as from a distinct atom to another, through an isolated channel, but through parts which are equal to the whole, the whole itself being equal to the parts. This approach has been characterized as “organicist”, studying and understanding communication as a dynamic process where the relationship between the elements is of prime importance. Reciprocal inclusion replaces the discursive aspects of communication and expression replaces representation. The reference point is thus situated beyond the mechanical parts of a whole ready to be dis- and reassembled. We conclude that through this perspective on communication, the notion of interaction between partners and between codes becomes a capital one and that, in this point, semiotics intersects with disciplines such as conversational analysis and the ethnography of communication.|
|Keywords||communication interaction School of Palo Alto content and relationship meaning signification representation and expression|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Codruţa Porcar (2011). Sign and Meaning: A Semiotic Approach to Communication. Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (1):20-29.
Youru Wang (2000). The Pragmatics of 'Never Tell Too Plainly': Indirect Communication in Chan Buddhism. Asian Philosophy 10 (1):7 – 31.
Ghislain Deslandes & Kenneth Casler (2011). Indirect Communication and Business Ethics. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 30 (3-4):307-330.
Aug Nishizaka (1995). The Interactive Constitution of Interculturality: How to Be a Japanese with Words. [REVIEW] Human Studies 18 (2-3):301 - 326.
Birgitta Dresp-Langley (2009). The Communication Contract and its ten Ground Clauses. Journal of Business Ethics 87 (3):415 - 436.
Melissa A. Cook & Annette Holba (eds.) (2008). Philosophies of Communication: Implications for Everyday Experience. Peter Lang.
Ipke Wachsmuth, Manuela Lenzen & Günther Knoblich (eds.) (2008). Embodied Communication in Humans and Machines. OUP Oxford.
Karl Grammer (2002). Is There Empirical Evidence for the Dynamic Nature of Communication Systems?: The Role of Synchronization and Inferential Communication. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (5):625-626.
Hsin-I. Liu (2007). How Is Communication Possible? The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:51-56.
Christian List (2011). Group Communication and the Transformation of Judgments: An Impossibility Result. Journal of Political Philosophy 19 (1):1-27.
Kevin Scharp (2003). Communication and Content: Circumstances and Consequences of the Habermas-Brandom Debate. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (1):43 – 61.
Thomas J. Cottle (1973). Review of David Nyberg, Tough and Tender Learning (Palo Alto: National Press Books, 1971). 181 Pages Plus Preface and References. [REVIEW] Educational Theory 23 (2):185-188.
Tomas Englund (2011). The Potential of Education for Creating Mutual Trust: Schools as Sites for Deliberation. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (3):236-248.
Added to index2012-01-09
Total downloads8 ( #131,797 of 739,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,269 of 739,404 )
How can I increase my downloads?