David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
We ought to perform our best option—that is, the option that we have most reason, all things considered, to perform. This is perhaps the most fundamental and least controversial of all normative principles concerning action. Yet, it is not, I believe, well understood. For even setting aside questions about what our reasons are and about how best to formulate the principle, there is a question about how we should construe our options. This question is of the upmost importance, for which option will count as being best depends on how broadly or narrowly we are to construe our options. In this paper, I argue that we ought to construe an agent’s options at a time, t, as being those actions (or sets of actions) that are scrupulously securable by her at t.
|Keywords||options obligations reasons rationality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Travis Timmerman (2015). Does Scrupulous Securitism Stand-Up to Scrutiny? Two Problems for Moral Securitism and How We Might Fix Them. Philosophical Studies 172 (6):1509-1528.
Similar books and articles
Douglas W. Portmore (2013). Perform Your Best Option. Journal of Philosophy 110 (8):436-459.
Alex Rajczi (2011). The Argument From Self-Creation: A Refutation of Act-Consequentialism and a Defense of Moral Options. American Philosophical Quarterly 48 (4):315.
Douglas W. Portmore (2008). Are Moral Reasons Morally Overriding? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (4):369 - 388.
Michael McDermott (2008). Are Plans Necessary? Philosophical Studies 138 (2):225 - 232.
Peter Vallentyne (1991). Motivational Ties and Doing What One Most Wats. Journal of Philosophical Research 16:443-445.
Richard Feldman (2006). Clifford's Principle and James's Options. Social Epistemology 20 (1):19 – 33.
Douglas W. Portmore, Chapter 5: Dual-Ranking Act-Consequentialism: Reasons, Morality, and Overridingness.
Matthew Noah Smith (2010). Practical Imagination and its Limits. Philosophers' Imprint 10 (3):1-20.
Paul Hurley (1995). Getting Our Options Clear: A Closer Look at Agent-Centered Options. Philosophical Studies 78 (2):163 - 188.
Christopher Knapp (2004). When Hard Choices Become Easy. American Journal of Philosophy 41 (4):232-330.
Brian Hedden (2012). Options and the Subjective Ought. Philosophical Studies 158 (2):343-360.
Douglas W. Portmore (2000). Commonsense Morality and Not Being Required to Maximize the Overall Good. Philosophical Studies 100 (2):193-213.
Bryan W. Husted (2005). Risk Management, Real Options, Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 60 (2):175 - 183.
Kiridaran Kanagaretnam, Robert Mathieu & Ramachandran Ramanan (2004). Outside Director Remuneration and the Decision to Grant CEO Stock Options. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (s 2-3):137-146.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads291 ( #7,588 of 1,907,897 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #106,510 of 1,907,897 )
How can I increase my downloads?