David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophical Research 31:239-248 (2006)
W. D. Ross’s ethical theory requires us somehow to compare the metaphorical “weights” of different prima facie duties, but it leaves mysterious how this might be done. The formulation of a procedure to achieve such a comparison would be desirable on practical, theoretical, and pedagogical grounds. I formulate a procedure that is congenial to Ross’s theory. Central to my procedure are instructions to characterize the weight of each prima facie duty with respect to (a) the general stringency of this kind of duty, (b) the stringency of this particular duty relative to other duties of its own kind, and (c) the degree to which the duty specifically demands the particular action that it favors in a given case. The procedure leads to a determination of one’s actual, all-things-considered duty in some cases but not in all
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
B. C. Postow (2008). Care Ethics and Impartial Reasons. Hypatia 23 (1):1-8.
Similar books and articles
Christopher Meyers (2011). Reappreciating W. D. Ross: Naturalizing Prima Facie Duties and a Proposed Method. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 26 (4):316-331.
Michael Robinson (2010). Are Some Prima Facie Duties More Binding Than Others? Utilitas 22 (1):26-32.
Michael Morreau (1996). Prima Facie and Seeming Duties. Studia Logica 57 (1):47 - 71.
Robert Audi (1998). Moderate Intuitionism and the Epistemology of Moral Judgment. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (1):15-44.
Charles Sayward (1988). W.D. Ross on Acting From Motives. Journal of Value Inquiry 22 (4):299-306.
Charles F. Blaich (1998). The Null-Hypothesis Significance-Test Procedure: Can't Live with It, Can't Live Without It. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):194-195.
James J. Brummer (2002). Ross and the Ambiguity of Prima Facie Duty. History of Philosophy Quarterly 19 (4):401 - 422.
Vojko Strahovnik (2005). The Good in the Right. [REVIEW] Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (15):583-589.
H. J. McCloskey (1963). Ross and the Concept of a Prima Facie Duty. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 41 (3):336 – 345.
Christopher Meyers (2003). Appreciating W. D. Ross:On Duties and Consequences. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 18 (2):81 – 97.
David B. Resnik (2005). The Patient's Duty to Adhere to Prescribed Treatment: An Ethical Analysis. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2):167 – 188.
David Miller (2005). Reasonable Partiality Towards Compatriots. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (1-2):63 - 81.
Paul R. Johnson (1981). Selective Nontreatment and Spina Bifida: A Case Study in Ethical Theory and Application. [REVIEW] Bioethics Quarterly 3 (2):91-111.
H. H. Jack (1971). Utilitarianism and Ross's Theory of Prima Facie Duties. Dialogue 10 (03):437-456.
John C. Harsanyi (1987). The Tracing Procedure: A Self-Correcting Reasoning Procedure. Theory and Decision 23 (1):7-23.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads18 ( #105,751 of 1,410,465 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #75,847 of 1,410,465 )
How can I increase my downloads?