How to generalize efficacy results of randomized trials: recommendations based on a systematic review of possible approaches

, &
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):638-643 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01888.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials: the need for complete data.Michael J. Clarke & Lesley A. Stewart - 1995 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1 (2):119-126.
Evidence-based policy: what’s to be done about relevance?: For the 2008 Oberlin Philosophy Colloquium. [REVIEW]Nancy Cartwright - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (1):127 - 136.
Opinions of researchers based in the uk on recruiting subjects from developing countries into randomized controlled trials.Sam K. Newton & John Appiah-Poku - 2007 - Developing World Bioethics 7 (3):149–156.
Bias in recruitment to cluster randomized trials: a review of recent publications. [REVIEW]Gwen Brierley, Sally Brabyn, David Torgerson & Judith Watson - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (4):878-886.
What are randomised controlled trials good for?Nancy Cartwright - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 147 (1):59 - 70.
Attitudes to evidence in acupuncture: an interview study. [REVIEW]Kirsten Hansen - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (3):279-285.
Shortcomings of the randomized controlled trial: a view from the boondocks.Joseph Herman Md - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (4):283-286.
A comparison of the scientific quality of publicly and privately funded randomized controlled drug trials.Richard Jones, Stuart Younie, Andrew Macallister & Jim Thornton - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (6):1322-1325.
Randomized Controlled Trials of Maternal‐Fetal Surgery: A Challenge to Clinical Equipoise.H. C. M. L. Rodrigues & P. P. van den Berg - 2012 - Bioethics 28 (8):405-413.
Problems associated with randomized controlled clinical trials in breast cancer.Ann E. Johnson - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (2):119-126.
Analysis of scientific truth status in controlled rehabilitation trials.Roger Kerry, Aurélien Madouasse, Antony Arthur & Stephen D. Mumford - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):617-625.
Riposte to Guest Commentaries on 'Problems associated with randomized controlled clinical trials in breast cancer'.Ann E. Johnson - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (3):231-236.
Exercise parameters in the treatment of clinical depression: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Luke G. Perraton, Saravana Kumar & Zuzana Machotka - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (3):597-604.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
23 (#644,212)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Measuring effectiveness.Jacob Stegenga - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 54:62-71.
Against external validity.Julian Reiss - 2019 - Synthese 196 (8):3103-3121.
The Risk GP Model: The Standard Model of Prediction in Medicine.Jonathan Fuller & Luis J. Flores - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 54:49-61.
Effectiveness of medical interventions.Jacob Stegenga - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 54:34-44.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

External validity: the neglected dimension in evidence ranking.Navindra Persaud & Muhammad M. Mamdani - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (4):450-453.

Add more references