David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Utilitas 18 (2):109-133 (2006)
The basic concept of Bentham's moral and political philosophy was public utility. He linked it directly with the concept of the universal interest, which comprises a distinctive partnership of the interests of all members of the community. The ultimate end of government and aim of all of morality is ‘the advancement of the universal interest’. This essay articulates the structure of Bentham's notion of universal interest and locates it in his theory of value.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
J. R. Dinwiddy (1989/2004). Bentham: Selected Writings of John Dinwiddy. Stanford University Press.
Jeremy Bentham (1780/2007). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Dover Publications.
David Lyons (1991). In the Interest of the Governed: A Study in Bentham's Philosophy of Utility and Law. Oxford University Press.
J. R. Dinwiddy (1989/2004). Bentham. Oxford University Press.
Philip Schofield (2009). Utility and Democracy: The Political Thought of Jeremy Bentham. OUP Oxford.
P. J. Kelly (1990). Utilitarianism and Distributive Justice: Jeremy Bentham and the Civil Law. Oxford University Press.
José Montoya (2004). The Sense of Mill's Early Criticism of Bentham. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):157-161.
Philip Schofield (2011). Jeremy Bentham and HLA Hart's 'Utilitarian Tradition in Jurisprudence'. Jurisprudence 1 (2):147-167.
Philippe Mongin & Nathalie Sigot (1999). Halévy's Bentham is Bentham. Philosophy 74 (2):271-281.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads168 ( #2,907 of 1,004,688 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #12,490 of 1,004,688 )
How can I increase my downloads?