Law, pragmatism, and democracy: Reply to Somin

Critical Review 16 (4):465-471 (2004)
Abstract
Abstract While pragmatism cannot resolve deep normative disagreements, it can, as a technique of judicial reasoning, at once resolve satisfactorily the majority of cases that do not involve such disagreements, while protecting democracy from overweening judicial assertiveness.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    Citations of this work BETA
    Similar books and articles
    Thom Brooks (2009). A Critique of Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):pp. 50-54.
    Charles William Morris (1934). Pragmatism and the Crisis of Democracy. Chicago, Ill.,The University of Chicago Press.
    John Cogan (2003). Review: Sidney Hook on Pragmatism, Democracy, and Freedom: The Essential Essays. [REVIEW] Newsletter of the Society for the Advancement of American Philosophy 31 (95):40-42.
    Alison Kadlec (0040). Critical Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy. Theoria (=117;User_Persona=false;ord=1234):54-80.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-10-18

    Total downloads

    3 ( #224,136 of 1,089,053 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,801 of 1,089,053 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.