Law, pragmatism, and democracy: Reply to Somin

Critical Review 16 (4):465-471 (2004)
Abstract
Abstract While pragmatism cannot resolve deep normative disagreements, it can, as a technique of judicial reasoning, at once resolve satisfactorily the majority of cases that do not involve such disagreements, while protecting democracy from overweening judicial assertiveness.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,005
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Thom Brooks (2009). A Critique of Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):pp. 50-54.
Charles William Morris (1934). Pragmatism and the Crisis of Democracy. Chicago, Ill.,The University of Chicago Press.
John Cogan (2003). Review: Sidney Hook on Pragmatism, Democracy, and Freedom: The Essential Essays. [REVIEW] Newsletter of the Society for the Advancement of American Philosophy 31 (95):40-42.
Alison Kadlec (0040). Critical Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy. Theoria (=117;User_Persona=false;ord=1234):54-80.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-10-18

Total downloads

4 ( #254,771 of 1,101,125 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #290,630 of 1,101,125 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.