David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
. In whatever form, terminal philosophy holds that some matters are so fundamental that they are presupposed in any practice of reason-giving; accordingly, if reason-giving were applied to such matters in order to justify them, or even to criticize, then the very attempt to do so would necessarily assume what is at issue, a fatal circularity . No further argumentative recourse is possible at this level of fundamentality ; rational reason-giving must terminate
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hilary Putnam (1985). Why Reason Can't Be Naturalized. In Realism and Reason. Cambridge University Press. 3-24.
David Enoch (2011). Giving Practical Reasons. Philosophers' Imprint 11 (4).
John Arthur Passmore (1958). The Objectivity of History. Philosophy 33 (125):97 - 111.
Marian David (2002). Minimalism and the Facts About Truth. In R. Schantz (ed.), What is Truth?
Christian List (2006). The Discursive Dilemma and Public Reason. Ethics 116 (2):362-402.
Panu Raatikainen (2005). On Horwich's Way Out. Analysis 65 (287):175-177.
Tyler Burge (2005). Truth, Thought, Reason: Essays on Frege. Oxford University Press.
John Fox (2008). What is at Issue Between Epistemic and Traditional Accounts of Truth? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (3):407 – 420.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #203,651 of 1,101,124 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #177,118 of 1,101,124 )
How can I increase my downloads?