Reasons for Action: Toward a Normative Theory and Meta-Level Criteria
Graduate studies at Western
Kluwer Academic (1999)
|Abstract||What, ultimately, is there good reason to do? This book proposes a unified theory of agent-dependent reasons and agent-independent reasons. It holds that principles which assign reasons to agents are valid if and only if they make maximally good sense in the light of relevant data and background theories. The theory avoids problems encountered by views associated with Nagel, Parfit, Brandt, Hubin, Gert, Baier, and Tiberius, amongst others. By what criteria should a normative theory of ultimate reasons be judged? Plausible meta-level criteria emerge from a process of identifying the criteria that have been used, sometimes unwittingly, by various theorists; categorizing and evaluating the criteria in the light of each other; and proposing revisions on that basis. This method escapes the drawbacks of rival approaches, such as those associated with Parfit, Gert, and Darwall. The resulting criteria cast a favorable light on the proposed normative theory of ultimate reasons.|
|Keywords||Normativity (Ethics Decision making Moral and ethical aspects|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$129.95 new (28% off) $146.00 used (19% off) $179.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BJ1458.3.P67 1999|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Donald C. Hubin (1999). Converging on Values. Analysis 59 (264):355–361.
Joshua Gert (2004). Brute Rationality: Normativity and Human Action. Cambridge University Press.
Stephen Finlay (2006). The Reasons That Matter. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (1):1 – 20.
Jonathan Dancy (2002). Practical Reality. Oxford University Press.
Roger Crisp (2006). Reasons and the Good. Clarendon Press.
Paul K. Moser (1990). Reasons, Values, and Rational Actions. Journal of Philosophical Research 15:127-151.
Eric Vogelstein (2011). Morality, Reasons, and Sentiments. Philosophical Studies 155 (3):421-432.
B. C. Postow (2007). Toward Honest Ethical Pluralism. Philosophical Studies 132 (2):191 - 210.
Selim Berker (2007). Particular Reasons. Ethics 118 (1):109-139.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?