REVIEW of Beilby, James, ed., Naturalism Defeated? for Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (2002) [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This collection of eleven critical essays, together with Plantinga's replies, examines his evolutionary argument against naturalism (EAAN). All but one of the eleven are printed here for the first time, all are of high quality, and all receive Plantinga's trademark treatment -- rigorous, perceptive, thorough. In view of the numerous arguments, sub-arguments and observations advanced by the eleven against EAAN, his responses amount to a tour de force . It would take too long to sort through the point-counterpoint with a view to laying out the many interconnections, valuable though that would be. Instead, after a sketch of EAAN, I summarize some of the key objections raised by the eleven, together with Plantinga's replies, then conclude with an objection of my own to what Plantinga calls the heart of his argument
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John F. Post (2002). Review of James Beilby (Ed.), Naturalism Defeated? Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (8).
James K. Beilby (ed.) (2002). Naturalism Defeated?: Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. Cornell University Press.
Paul Draper (2004). James Beilby (Ed.), Naturalism Defeated? Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 55 (1):65-68.
Michael Thune (2006). Naturalism, Hope, and Alethic Rationality. Philo 9 (1):5-11.
Tyler Wunder (2007). Critical Study of James K. Beilby, Epistemology as Theology: An Evaluation of Alvin Plantinga's Religious Epistemology. Philo 10 (2):168-186.
Branden Fitelson & Elliott Sober (1998). Plantinga's Probability Arguments Against Evolutionary Naturalism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (2):115–129.
Brian Leahy (2013). Can Teleosemantics Deflect the EAAN? Philosophia 41 (1):221-238.
Yingjin Xu (2011). The Troublesome Explanandum in Plantinga's Argument Against Naturalism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (1):1-15.
Timothy O'Connor (2001). A House Divided Against Itself Cannot Stand: Plantinga on the Self-Defeat of Evolutionary Naturalism. In James Beilby (ed.), Naturalism Defeated? Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. Cornell.
Omar Mirza (2008). A User's Guide to the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. Philosophical Studies 141 (2):125 - 146.
N. M. L. Nathan (1997). Naturalism and Self-Defeat: Plantinga's Version. Religious Studies 33 (2):135-142.
David Reiter (2000). Plantinga on the Epistemic Implications of Naturalism. Journal of Philosophical Research 25:141-147.
Rik Peels (2013). Are Naturalism and Moral Realism Incompatible? Religious Studies (1):1-10.
James Beilby (2007). Plantinga's Model of Warranted Christian Belief. In Deane-Peter Baker (ed.), Alvin Plantinga. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas C. Vinci (2008). Review of James R. O'Shea, Wilfrid Sellars: Naturalism with a Normative Turn. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (4).
Added to index2010-11-23
Total downloads15 ( #109,680 of 1,102,762 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #120,475 of 1,102,762 )
How can I increase my downloads?