Abstraction by recarving
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (3):327–338 (2001)
| Abstract | Explains why Bob Hale's proposed notion of weak sense cannot explain the analyticity of Hume's principle as he claims. Argues that no other notion of the sort Hale wants could do the job either. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBob Hale & Crispin Wright (2009). The Metaontology of Abstraction. In David John Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press.
Vadim Batitsky (2002). Some Measurement-Theoretic Concerns About Hale's ‘Reals by Abstraction';. Philosophia Mathematica 10 (3):286-303.
Bob Hale (1988). Abstract Objects. B. Blackwell.
Bob Hale (2006). The Limits of Abstraction. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (1):223–232.
Michael Potter & Peter Sullivan (2005). What Is Wrong with Abstraction? Philosophia Mathematica 13 (2):187-193.
Bob Hale (2000). Reals by Abstractiont. Philosophia Mathematica 8 (2):100--123.
Roy T. Cook (2002). The State of the Economy: Neo-Logicism and Inflationt. Philosophia Mathematica 10 (1):43-66.
Bob Hale & Crispin Wright (2008). Abstraction and Additional Nature. Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2):182-208.
Bob Hale (2001). A Response to Potter and Smiley: Abstraction by Recarving. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (3):339–358.
Michael Potter & Timothy Smiley (2002). Recarving Content: Hale's Final Proposal. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (3):301–304.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads17 ( #71,101 of 549,088 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,088 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
