David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):699-700 (2001)
Shepard's theoretical analysis of generalization is assumed to enable an objective measure of the relation between objects, an assumption taken on board by Tenenbaum & Griffiths. I argue that context effects apply to generalization in the same way as they apply to similarity. Thus, the need to extend Shepard's formalism in a way that incorporates context effects should be acknowledged. [Shepard; Tenenbaum & Griffiths].
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Eva Feder Kittay (1982). The Creation of Similarity: A Discussion of Metaphor in Light of Tversky's Theory of Similarity. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:394 - 405.
Dedre Gentner (2001). Exhuming Similarity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):669-669.
Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Thomas L. Griffiths (2001). Generalization, Similarity, and Bayesian Inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):629-640.
David Dowe & Graham Oppy (2001). Universal Bayesian Inference? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):662-663.
Michael D. Lee (2001). Extending Bayesian Concept Learning to Deal with Representational Complexity and Adaptation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):685-686.
Evan Heit (2001). What is the Probability of the Bayesian Model, Given the Data? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):672-673.
David E. Buschena & David Zilberman (1999). Testing the Effects of Similarity on Risky Choice: Implications for Violations of Expected Utility. Theory and Decision 46 (3):253-280.
Ken Cheng (2001). Generalization and Tinbergen's Four Whys. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):660-661.
Nick Chater, Paul M. B. Vitányi & Neil Stewart (2001). Universal Generalization and Universal Inter-Item Confusability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):659-660.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #741,121 of 1,789,736 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #418,435 of 1,789,736 )
How can I increase my downloads?