Into the conventional-implicature dimension
Philosophy Compass 2 (4):665–679 (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesStephen Finlay (2005). Value and Implicature. Philosophers' Imprint 5 (4):1-20.
Robert Francescotti (1995). Even: The Conventional Implicature Approach Reconsidered. Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (2):153 - 173.
Stephen J. Barker (2000). Is Value Content a Component of Conventional Implicature? Analysis 60 (267):268–279.
Patricia Amaral, Craige Roberts & E. Allyn Smith (2007). Review of the Logic of Conventional Implicatures by Chris Potts. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (6):707-749.
Stephen Barker (2003). Truth and Conventional Implicature. Mind 112 (445):1-34.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads121 ( #4,174 of 549,754 )Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #12,458 of 549,754 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
