Recarving content: Hale's final proposal
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (3):301–304 (2002)
| Abstract | A follow-up, showing why Bob Hale's revision of his notion of weak sense is still inadequate. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesNikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2009). Solving the Caesar Problem Without Categorical Sortals. Erkenntnis 71 (2):141 - 155.
Vadim Batitsky (2002). Some Measurement-Theoretic Concerns About Hale's ‘Reals by Abstraction';. Philosophia Mathematica 10 (3):286-303.
Terence Horgan (1987). Science Nominalized Properly. Philosophy of Science 54 (2):281-282.
Bob Hale (2011). Erratum To: The Bearable Lightness of Being. Axiomathes 21 (4):597-597.
Michael Potter & Peter Sullivan (2005). What Is Wrong with Abstraction? Philosophia Mathematica 13 (2):187-193.
Peter Sullivan & Michael Potter (1997). Hale on Caesar. Philosophia Mathematica 5 (2):135--52.
Bob Hale (1999). Intuition and Reflection in Arithmetic: Bob Hale. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73 (1):75–98.
Bob Hale (2001). A Response to Potter and Smiley: Abstraction by Recarving. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (3):339–358.
Michael Potter & Timothy Smiley (2001). Abstraction by Recarving. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (3):327–338.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads15 ( #78,761 of 550,802 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 550,802 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
