Madness versus badness: The ethical tension between the recovery movement and forensic psychiatry [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (1):93-105 (2010)
The mental health recovery movement promotes patient self-determination and opposes coercive psychiatric treatment. While it has made great strides towards these ends, its rhetoric impairs its political efficacy. We illustrate how psychiatry can share recovery values and yet appear to violate them. In certain criminal proceedings, for example, forensic psychiatrists routinely argue that persons with mental illness who have committed crimes are not full moral agents. Such arguments align with the recovery movement’s aim of providing appropriate treatment and services for people with severe mental illness, but contradict its fundamental principle of self-determination. We suggest that this contradiction should be addressed with some urgency, and we recommend a multidisciplinary collaborative effort involving ethics, law, psychiatry, and social policy to address this and other ethical questions that arise as the United States strives to implement recovery-oriented programs.
|Keywords||Recovery movement Bioethics Psychiatry Social policy Moral agency|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
K. W. M. Fulford (1989). Moral Theory and Medical Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Paul S. Appelbaum, Charles W. Lidz & Robert Klitzman (2009). Voluntariness of Consent to Research: A Conceptual Model. Hastings Center Report 39 (1):30-39.
Thomas Stephen Szasz (1974). The Myth of Mental Illness: Foundations of a Theory of Personal Conduct. New York,Harper & Row.
George L. Engel (1981). The Clinical Application of the Biopsychosocial Model. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (2):101-124.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sidney Bloch & Stephen A. Green (eds.) (2009). Psychiatric Ethics. Oxford University Press.
D. B. Double (ed.) (2006). Critical Psychiatry: The Limits of Madness. Palgrave Macmillan.
Patrick Bracken (2005). Postpsychiatry. Oxford University Press.
Elleke Landeweer, Tineke Abma, Jolijn Santegoeds & Guy Widdershoven (2008). Psychiatry in the Age of Neuroscience: The Impact on Clinical Practice and Lives of Patients. Poiesis and Praxis 6 (1-2):43-55.
John Z. Sadler (2005). Values and Psychiatric Diagnosis. Oxford University Press.
Linda Joy Morrison (2005). Talking Back to Psychiatry: The Psychiatric Consumer/Survivor/Ex-Patient Movement. Routledge.
Joel Paris (2008). Prescriptions for the Mind: A Critical View of Contemporary Psychiatry. Oxford University Press.
Martin Roth (1986). The Reality of Mental Illness. Cambridge University Press.
Lennart Nordenfelt (1992). On Crime, Punishment, and Psychiatric Care: An Introduction to Swedish Philosophy of Criminal Law and Forensic Psychiatry. Almqvist & Wiksell International.
Added to index2010-03-20
Total downloads54 ( #76,518 of 1,792,149 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #73,406 of 1,792,149 )
How can I increase my downloads?