David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):1 - 20 (2011)
Philosophers of religion of the Cracow Circle (1934-1944) are the principal precursors of what is now called the analytic philosophy of religion. The widespread claim that the analytic philosophy of religion was from the beginning an Anglo-American affair is an ill-informed one. It is demonstrable that the enterprise, although not the label "analytic philosophy of religion," appeared in Poland in the 1930’s. Józef Bochenski’s postwar work is a development of the Cracow Circle’s prewar work in the analytic philosophy of religion, or at least of important elements of that earlier work. Bochenski’s approach in his ’Logic of Religion’ is quite original and might still be profitably studied and discussed by philosophers of religion of the analytic persuasion
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Roger Pouivet (2013). Bocheński on Divine Ineffability. Studies in East European Thought 65 (1-2):43-51.
Anders Kraal (2013). The Emergence of Logical Formalization in the Philosophy of Religion: Genesis, Crisis, and Rehabilitation. History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (4):351 - 366.
Similar books and articles
Pamela Anderson (2010). Pure Reason and Contemporary Philosophy of Religion: The Rational Striving in and for Truth. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1):95-106.
Paul Lauritzen (1984). Philosophy of Religion and the Mirror of Nature: Rorty's Challenge to Analytic Philosophy of Religion. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16 (1):29 - 39.
Jerome Gellman (2011). I Called to God From a Narrow Place a Wide Future for Philosophy of Religion. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):43 - 66.
Shabbir Ahsen (2010). Ludwig Wittgenstein: Ethics and Religion (Review). [REVIEW] Philosophy East and West 60 (3):422-424.
William L. Power (2004). James F. Harris, Analytic Philosophy of Religion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 55 (3):193-195.
J. Kellenberger (1990). Wittgenstein's Gift to Contemporary Analytic Philosophy of Religion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 28 (3):147 - 172.
Michael P. Levine (2000). Contemporary Christian Analytic Philosophy of Religion: Biblical Fundamentalism, Terrible Solutions to a Horrible Problem, and Hearing God. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 48 (2):89-119.
Ann Garry, Analytic Feminism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
John Cottingham (2009). The Lessons of Life : Wittgenstein, Religion, and Analytic Philosophy. In P. M. S. Hacker, Hans-Johann Glock & John Hyman (eds.), Wittgenstein and Analytic Philosophy: Essays for P.M.S. Hacker. Oxford University Press.
D. Z. Phillips & Timothy Tessin (eds.) (1999). Religion and Hume's Legacy. St. Martin's Press, Scholarly and Reference Division.
Daniel Andler (2000). The Undefinability of Analytic Philosophy. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:267-285.
Paul Redding (2007). Analytic Philosophy and the Return of Hegelian Thought. Cambridge University Press.
Mark T. Nelson (2004). Must We Argue? The Philosophers' Magazine (26):41-42.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-06-02
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?