On the Polish Roots of the Analytic Philosophy of Religion

Abstract
Philosophers of religion of the Cracow Circle (1934-1944) are the principal precursors of what is now called the analytic philosophy of religion. The widespread claim that the analytic philosophy of religion was from the beginning an Anglo-American affair is an ill-informed one. It is demonstrable that the enterprise, although not the label "analytic philosophy of religion," appeared in Poland in the 1930’s. Józef Bochenski’s postwar work is a development of the Cracow Circle’s prewar work in the analytic philosophy of religion, or at least of important elements of that earlier work. Bochenski’s approach in his ’Logic of Religion’ is quite original and might still be profitably studied and discussed by philosophers of religion of the analytic persuasion
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,825
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Roger Pouivet (2013). Bocheński on Divine Ineffability. Studies in East European Thought 65 (1-2):43-51.
Similar books and articles
William L. Power (2004). James F. Harris, Analytic Philosophy of Religion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 55 (3):193-195.
J. Kellenberger (1990). Wittgenstein's Gift to Contemporary Analytic Philosophy of Religion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 28 (3):147 - 172.
Ann Garry, Analytic Feminism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
D. Z. Phillips & Timothy Tessin (eds.) (1999). Religion and Hume's Legacy. St. Martin's Press, Scholarly and Reference Division.
Daniel Andler (2000). The Undefinability of Analytic Philosophy. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:267-285.
Mark T. Nelson (2004). Must We Argue? The Philosophers' Magazine (26):41-42.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-06-02

Total downloads

2 ( #362,008 of 1,100,076 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #190,060 of 1,100,076 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.