Graduate studies at Western
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (2):129-144 (1996)
|Abstract||: Justice is widely thought to consist in equality. For many theorists, the central question has been: Equality of what? The author argues that the ideal of equality distorts practical reasoning and has deeply counterintuitive implications. Moreover, an alternative view of distributive justice can give a better account of what egalitarians should care about than can any of the competing ideals of equality|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Roger Fjellstrom (2002). Equality Does Not Entail Equality Across Species. Environmental Ethics 24 (4):339-352.
Sagar Sanyal (2012). A Defence of Democratic Egalitarianism. Journal of Philosophy 109 (7):413-34.
Gillian Brock (2005). Egalitarianism, Ideals, and Cosmopolitan Justice. Philosophical Forum 36 (1):1–30.
Richard Arneson (2008). Justice is Not Equality. Ratio 21 (4):371-391.
Harry Brighouse & Adam Swift (2009). Educational Equality Versus Educational Adequacy: A Critique of Anderson and Satz. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2):117-128.
Harry Brighouse (2007). Equality of Opportunity and Complex Equality: The Special Place of Schooling. [REVIEW] Res Publica 13 (2):147-158.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #32,763 of 739,125 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,464 of 739,125 )
How can I increase my downloads?