Graduate studies at Western
Public Health Ethics 5 (1):6-15 (2012)
|Abstract||In this article, we address the relevance of J.S. Mill’s political philosophy for a framework of public health ethics. In contrast to some readings of Mill, we reject the view that in the formulation of public policies liberties of all kinds enjoy an equal presumption in their favor. We argue that Mill also rejects this view and discuss the distinction that Mill makes between three kinds of liberty interests: interests that are immune from state interference; interests that enjoy a presumption in favor of liberty; and interests that enjoy no such presumption. We argue that what is of focal importance for Mill in protecting liberty is captured by the essential role that the value of self-determination plays in human well-being. Finally, we make the case for the plausibility of a more complex and nuanced Millian framework for public health ethics that would modify how the balancing of some liberty and public health interests should proceed by taking the thumb off the liberty end of the scale. Mill’s arguments and the legacy of liberalism support certain forms of state interference with marketplace liberties for the sake of public health objectives without any presumption in favor of liberty|
|Keywords||Mill Liberty Public health ethics Control Self-determination|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Similar books and articles
Bruce Jennings (2009). Public Health and Liberty: Beyond the Millian Paradigm. Public Health Ethics 2 (2):123-134.
Chin-Liew Ten (2002). Was Mill a Liberal? Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (3):355-370.
Sean Donaghue Johnston (2011). John Stuart Mill on Health Care Reform. Social Philosophy Today 27:63-74.
M. Allen (2011). Is Liberty Bad for Your Health? Towards a Moderate View of the Robust Coequality of Liberty and Health. Public Health Ethics 4 (3):260-268.
J. Wilson (2011). Why It's Time to Stop Worrying About Paternalism in Health Policy. Public Health Ethics 4 (3):269-279.
Jonathan Wolff (1998). Mill, Indecency and the Liberty Principle. Utilitas 10 (1):1-16.
Richard Arneson, Listed Below Are Some Examples That Mil Introduces to Help Interpret His Liberty Principle and to Illustrate its Application.
Ted Honderich (1967). Mill on Liberty. Inquiry 10 (1-4):292 – 297.
H. W. Jaffe & T. Hope (2010). Treating for the Common Good: A Proposed Ethical Framework. Public Health Ethics 3 (3):193-198.
Dr James Wilson (2010). Giving Liberty Its Due, But No More: Trans Fats, Liberty, and Public Health. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (3):34-36.
Alan Haworth (2007). On Mill, Infallibility, and Freedom of Expression. Res Publica 13 (1):77-100.
Jonny Anomaly (2011). Public Health and Public Goods. Public Health Ethics 4 (3):251-259.
Added to index2012-02-17
Total downloads25 ( #55,763 of 738,397 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #8,376 of 738,397 )
How can I increase my downloads?