David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (1):45-59 (2012)
The degree of justification for a judgment of artistic value is normally directly proportional to the size of the comparison class that is brought to bear in making that judgment. If that comparison class is very small or nonexistent, justified judgments are unlikely or impossible. So which artworks, if any, are comparable? The claim that evaluative comparisons can be made among artworks within a fine-grained category—abstract expressionist paintings, for example—is relatively uncontroversial. But is there any way that we can compare artworks that have only a very coarse-grained category in common (such as two works of visual art), or that are in completely different coarse-grained categories (such as a symphony and a sculpture)? I argue that both very similar and very different artworks can be compared evaluatively. Comparisons within fine-grained categories are common, and reflection on critical practices shows us that they depend crucially on qualitative assessments of artistically valuable properties. Once qualitative assessment is recognized as underwriting artistic criticism, it follows that even rough-grained categorization provides no essential barrier to comparison, securing the possibility of well-justified evaluations of disparate artworks
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Dilworth (2008). The Abstractness of Artworks and Its Implications for Aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (4):341-353.
Daniel A. Kaufman (2003). Critical Justification and Critical Laws. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (4):393-400.
John Dilworth (2003). Pictorial Orientation Matters. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (1):39-56.
Marcus Rossberg (2013). Destroying Artworks. In Christy Mag Uidhir (ed.), Art & Abstract Objects. Oxford University Press
Christy Mag Uidhir (ed.) (2013). Art & Abstract Objects. Oxford University Press.
Jason Simus (2008). Environmental Art and Ecological Citizenship. Environmental Ethics 30 (1):21-36.
James Shelley (2002). The Character and Role of Principles in the Evaluation of Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (1):37-51.
Nicolas de Warren (2007). Off the Beaten Path: The Artworks of Andrew Goldsworthy. Environmental Philosophy 4 (1-2):29-48.
C. Tillman (2011). Musical Materialism. British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (1):13-29.
James Shelley (2003). The Problem of Non-Perceptual Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (4):363-378.
Catharine Abell (2005). The Public Cost of Private Ownership of Artworks. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):76-81.
John Dilworth (2007). In Support of Content Theories of Art. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (1):19 – 39.
Added to index2012-01-14
Total downloads12 ( #279,819 of 1,792,082 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,591 of 1,792,082 )
How can I increase my downloads?